H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Alizé Cornet vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 1-0
Alizé Cornet holds a 1–0 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alizé Cornet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alizé Cornet won the 2008 Roland Garros second round 6-0 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 36
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Alizé Cornet | 6-0 4-6 6-4 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alizé Cornet | #460 | #11 | 3,256 | 1,884 | 376 | 358 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alizé Cornet | Gisela Dulko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2007 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #16 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #49 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #88 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #44 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2013 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #27 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2014 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #19 | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2015 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #43 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2016 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,702 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2017 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #38 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2018 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,693 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #59 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,763 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #61 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #117 | 1,684 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #391 | 1,613 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,558 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |