H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Amanda Anisimova vs Alison Van Uytvanck H2H: 2-0

Amanda Anisimova holds a 2–0 lead over Alison Van Uytvanck in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2022 Bad Homburg Open first round 3-6 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Anisimova
United States Age 25 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Alison Van Uytvanck
Belgium Age 32 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Anisimova #25 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) Alison Van Uytvanck #46 Match data Jun 22, 2022* R32 Bad Homburg Open WTA 250 Grass
Amanda Anisimova #78 7-6(5) 1-6 7-5 Alison Van Uytvanck #58 Match data Jan 6, 2022* R32 Melbourne 2 WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Anisimova #10 #4 6,680 2,125 179 107 62.6% 0 2 0 0 2 4
Alison Van Uytvanck #229 #37 1,355 1,772 123 149 45.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Anisimova Alison Van Uytvanck
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2017 0–2 0.0% #191 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2018 11–6 64.7% #96 1,683 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2019 23–13 63.9% #24 1,765 0 1 2011 1–2 33.3% #287 1,510 0 0
18 2020 11–10 52.4% #30 1,778 0 1 2012 2–1 66.7% #199 1,554 0 0
19 2021 14–15 48.3% #78 1,779 0 1 2013 1–3 25.0% #112 1,524 0 0
20 2022 33–14 70.2% #23 1,927 0 2 2014 10–17 37.0% #106 1,526 0 0
21 2023 2–7 22.2% #369 1,793 0 2 2015 19–18 51.4% #44 1,647 0 0
22 2024 17–12 58.6% #36 1,892 0 2 2016 4–13 23.5% #121 1,516 0 0
23 2025 45–16 73.8% #4 2,114 0 4 2017 9–8 52.9% #76 1,634 0 1
24 2026 23–12 65.7% #10 2,011 0 4 2018 19–22 46.3% #49 1,660 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2019 24–18 57.1% #47 1,736 0 4
26 — — — — — — — 2020 7–11 38.9% #64 1,674 0 4
27 — — — — — — — 2021 15–15 50.0% #58 1,772 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 2022 9–13 40.9% #72 1,685 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #344 1,687 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 2024 0–4 0.0% #229 1,609 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Anisimova Alison Van Uytvanck
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 9 8 17 52.9% 11 3 14 78.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2012 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 2021 8 7 15 53.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2022 14 8 22 63.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 2014 6 11 17 35.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2023 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2024 15 8 23 65.2% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2016 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
23 2025 27 10 37 73.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 2017 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2026 18 9 27 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2018 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 17 11 28 60.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 13 10 23 56.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 112 70 182 61.5% 41 25 66 62.1% 26 12 38 68.4% — 85 90 175 48.6% 22 34 56 39.3% 16 25 41 39.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/290 of Amanda Anisimova's and 250/272 of Alison Van Uytvanck's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amanda Anisimova Alison Van Uytvanck
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2017 2/2 2.0 3.0 56.5% 58.9% 38.9% 56.1% 46.1% 50.4% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 16/17 0.9 3.0 67.0% 66.6% 51.5% 59.8% 49.3% 61.5% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 35/36 1.4 3.8 65.4% 63.1% 48.2% 61.3% 48.8% 57.6% 47.7% 2011 3/3 4.0 5.3 61.8% 66.5% 34.7% 49.3% 52.4% 54.4% 42.3%
18 2020 20/21 1.6 2.8 66.6% 60.7% 45.3% 46.4% 44.0% 55.2% 43.6% 2012 3/3 4.3 2.0 59.4% 63.4% 49.6% 61.1% 31.4% 57.9% 37.7%
19 2021 29/29 2.2 3.1 66.0% 65.3% 47.5% 50.6% 54.4% 59.4% 46.2% 2013 4/4 2.5 2.0 60.5% 56.2% 32.9% 46.0% 48.3% 50.4% 41.2%
20 2022 44/47 2.9 3.6 65.6% 66.5% 48.7% 52.8% 50.6% 60.3% 44.5% 2014 27/27 2.8 1.9 60.8% 63.0% 51.0% 51.3% 46.0% 58.1% 40.9%
21 2023 9/9 1.8 4.1 65.2% 61.7% 44.6% 47.8% 42.5% 55.7% 40.9% 2015 23/37 4.4 2.2 58.9% 64.4% 48.6% 53.1% 49.1% 57.9% 36.7%
22 2024 28/29 2.9 4.6 61.6% 61.3% 49.1% 55.4% 53.8% 56.5% 44.0% 2016 17/17 4.3 3.5 56.8% 67.4% 44.6% 54.9% 47.7% 57.8% 38.5%
23 2025 44/64 3.9 4.2 63.1% 67.4% 49.9% 56.3% 47.4% 61.1% 44.5% 2017 14/17 4.9 2.8 55.4% 69.1% 53.4% 64.4% 41.5% 62.4% 41.1%
24 2026 31/36 3.5 4.0 64.0% 68.9% 50.4% 47.4% 54.2% 62.3% 47.2% 2018 39/41 4.2 2.6 62.4% 65.5% 48.1% 61.6% 44.8% 59.2% 42.5%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 42/42 3.2 2.0 64.8% 63.0% 47.3% 55.8% 46.2% 57.4% 44.5%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 18/18 3.0 2.2 62.3% 66.6% 46.1% 47.0% 40.8% 58.7% 41.1%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 27/30 2.6 1.9 60.0% 63.1% 45.0% 54.3% 52.1% 56.0% 44.7%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 22/22 2.7 2.5 58.2% 64.6% 48.0% 60.7% 42.8% 57.8% 43.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 7/7 4.9 2.1 60.8% 65.7% 40.3% 59.0% 60.3% 55.8% 40.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 4/4 2.0 1.8 61.9% 50.4% 34.4% 43.3% 51.0% 44.3% 40.5%
Career — 258/290 2.6 3.8 64.6% 65.1% 48.7% 53.7% 50.1% 59.2% 45.3% — 250/272 3.5 2.3 60.8% 64.4% 47.1% 55.7% 46.4% 57.7% 41.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Anisimova Alison Van Uytvanck
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2017 1483 101.2 -0.25 -2.07 0.921 48.2% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 1683 142.2 +4.05 +2.84 1.199 54.1% +12 — — 68.6% +1.34 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 1765 138.6 +0.98 +4.05 1.126 52.6% -48 -32 -110 63.0% +0.84 6–7 (46%) 6–1 (86%) 104.3 +0.69 2011 1511 108.0 -2.51 -2.37 0.928 48.7% — — — 28.6% -0.43 1–0 0–2 — -0.15
18 2020 1778 138.0 -0.33 +0.69 0.973 49.5% -19 -30 — 55.6% +0.18 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 98.4 -0.42 2012 1555 103.7 +2.11 -1.71 0.894 47.9% — +51 — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 — — +0.05
19 2021 1780 139.7 +2.46 +2.91 1.136 52.6% +8 -45 -146 51.5% +0.55 2–8 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 92.9 -1.37 2013 1524 90.5 -1.68 -1.92 0.831 45.8% — — — 25.0% -2.13 — 0–1 — +0.29
20 2022 1927 151.1 +2.94 +2.37 1.120 52.3% -73 -6 -126 65.1% +0.87 13–5 (72%) 5–2 (71%) 110.1 -2.09 2014 1526 113.6 +1.00 -2.70 0.975 49.4% -8 +12 +42 43.3% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 92.5 +0.20
21 2023 1794 127.1 -0.58 -0.40 0.923 48.2% -29 — — 29.4% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — -0.26 2015 1647 123.7 +0.26 -3.01 0.870 47.5% -6 -88 -87 50.6% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 106.0 +0.57
22 2024 1892 146.4 +0.57 +1.45 1.010 50.3% +36 -108 — 62.3% +0.41 3–6 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.8 -1.57 2016 1517 106.5 +0.03 -3.82 0.912 48.2% +32 — -45 36.6% -0.90 0–7 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 92.1 +0.27
23 2025 2115 162.2 +3.85 +2.19 1.142 52.6% +10 -238 -59 66.7% +1.09 15–4 (79%) 9–5 (64%) 113.5 -0.29 2017 1634 121.0 +2.65 -1.27 1.095 51.6% +11 -34 — 55.3% +0.42 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 +0.26
24 2026 2012 157.7 +4.36 +4.19 1.250 54.7% +44 -142 +2 60.8% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 +1.28 2018 1661 129.7 +1.86 -0.17 1.042 50.6% -23 -93 -60 46.9% +0.15 8–8 (50%) 4–10 (29%) 97.5 -1.03
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1736 130.4 +0.69 +0.82 1.044 50.9% -1 -93 -105 55.9% +0.33 9–4 (69%) 4–1 (80%) 107.5 +0.05
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1674 126.9 +0.77 -1.27 0.995 49.6% +24 -57 — 46.3% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.2 +0.13
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1772 134.7 -0.09 +1.01 1.015 50.6% +34 -271 -124 51.5% +0.36 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — -0.37
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1685 128.7 +0.29 +0.04 1.018 50.4% -5 — +57 50.0% +0.19 0–8 (0%) 2–6 (25%) 86.9 +0.23
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1687 120.1 -1.26 +0.60 0.919 48.7% -9 — — 50.0% -0.39 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -0.67
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1609 96.6 -3.25 -1.92 0.727 42.6% — — — 11.1% -2.89 0–1 — — +0.23
Career — 2126 156.9 +2.36 +2.51 1.111 52.2% -1 -68 -83 61.2% +0.77 49–44 (53%) 32–25 (56%) 106.2 -1.30 — 1772 129.8 +0.64 -0.86 0.987 49.7% +4 -70 -50 48.1% -0.02 39–53 (42%) 28–44 (39%) 92.0 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.