H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Amanda Anisimova vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 1-1
Amanda Anisimova and Saisai Zheng are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2019 San Jose quarterfinal 5-7 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2019* | San Jose | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 5-7 7-5 6-4 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
| Sep 14, 2018* | Hiroshima | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-1 6-1 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Amanda Anisimova | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |