H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Amanda Anisimova vs Shelby Rogers H2H: 0-4 (incl. walkovers)

Amanda Anisimova vs Shelby Rogers: 0–3 excluding walkovers; 0–4 including 1 walkover. Across 4 main-draw results including walkovers, Shelby Rogers leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shelby Rogers won the 2022 Cincinnati Open second round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Amanda Anisimova
United States Age 25 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H including walkovers
0 – 4
4 main-draw results
Shelby Rogers
United States Age 33 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shelby Rogers #30 (w/o) Amanda Anisimova #23 Match data Aug 18, 2022* R32 Cincinnati Open WTA 1000 Hard
Shelby Rogers #45 6-4 6-4 Amanda Anisimova #22 Match data Aug 6, 2022* QF San Jose WTA 500 Hard
Shelby Rogers #48 3-6 6-0 6-3 Amanda Anisimova #41 Match data Mar 24, 2022* R128 Miami Open WTA 1000 Hard
Shelby Rogers #52 1-6 7-5 6-4 Amanda Anisimova #33 Match data Apr 8, 2021* R32 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Amanda Anisimova #10 #4 6,680 2,125 179 107 62.6% 0 2 0 0 2 4
Shelby Rogers #437 #30 1,698 1,855 126 140 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Amanda Anisimova Shelby Rogers
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2017 0–2 0.0% #191 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2018 11–6 64.7% #96 1,683 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2019 23–13 63.9% #24 1,765 0 1 2010 0–1 0.0% #352 1,494 0 0
18 2020 11–10 52.4% #30 1,778 0 1 2011 0–1 0.0% #426 1,479 0 0
19 2021 14–15 48.3% #78 1,779 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2022 33–14 70.2% #23 1,927 0 2 2013 2–3 40.0% #126 1,478 0 0
21 2023 2–7 22.2% #369 1,793 0 2 2014 12–9 57.1% #72 1,630 0 0
22 2024 17–12 58.6% #36 1,892 0 2 2015 4–14 22.2% #151 1,527 0 0
23 2025 45–16 73.8% #4 2,114 0 4 2016 13–15 46.4% #59 1,585 0 0
24 2026 23–12 65.7% #10 2,011 0 4 2017 23–19 54.8% #59 1,689 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2018 0–2 0.0% #630 1,650 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2019 3–9 25.0% #177 1,574 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2020 8–6 57.1% #60 1,679 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2021 28–21 57.1% #40 1,804 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2022 20–19 51.3% #47 1,804 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2023 9–13 40.9% #149 1,773 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2024 4–8 33.3% #341 1,675 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Amanda Anisimova Shelby Rogers
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 9 8 17 52.9% 11 3 14 78.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2021 8 7 15 53.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2022 14 8 22 63.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2023 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
22 2024 15 8 23 65.2% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2015 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2025 27 10 37 73.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2026 18 9 27 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2017 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 20 12 32 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 14 11 25 56.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 6 7 13 46.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
Career — 112 70 182 61.5% 41 25 66 62.1% 26 12 38 68.4% — 77 82 159 48.4% 38 40 78 48.7% 11 18 29 37.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/290 of Amanda Anisimova's and 252/266 of Shelby Rogers's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Amanda Anisimova Shelby Rogers
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2017 2/2 2.0 3.0 56.5% 58.9% 38.9% 56.1% 46.1% 50.4% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 16/17 0.9 3.0 67.0% 66.6% 51.5% 59.8% 49.3% 61.5% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 35/36 1.4 3.8 65.4% 63.1% 48.2% 61.3% 48.8% 57.6% 47.7% 2010 1/1 2.0 9.0 49.2% 68.9% 41.3% 60.0% 60.0% 54.8% 35.5%
18 2020 20/21 1.6 2.8 66.6% 60.7% 45.3% 46.4% 44.0% 55.2% 43.6% 2011 1/1 3.0 4.0 51.7% 54.8% 51.7% 37.5% 22.2% 53.3% 36.7%
19 2021 29/29 2.2 3.1 66.0% 65.3% 47.5% 50.6% 54.4% 59.4% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2022 44/47 2.9 3.6 65.6% 66.5% 48.7% 52.8% 50.6% 60.3% 44.5% 2013 3/5 4.0 1.3 62.8% 67.6% 53.3% 59.4% 27.8% 62.3% 34.2%
21 2023 9/9 1.8 4.1 65.2% 61.7% 44.6% 47.8% 42.5% 55.7% 40.9% 2014 20/21 3.3 3.5 59.4% 66.1% 43.5% 47.9% 39.3% 57.1% 42.8%
22 2024 28/29 2.9 4.6 61.6% 61.3% 49.1% 55.4% 53.8% 56.5% 44.0% 2015 13/18 1.8 4.1 61.1% 58.1% 48.5% 48.5% 41.6% 54.1% 35.9%
23 2025 44/64 3.9 4.2 63.1% 67.4% 49.9% 56.3% 47.4% 61.1% 44.5% 2016 25/28 3.5 3.0 59.2% 65.0% 50.8% 53.1% 54.6% 59.3% 43.0%
24 2026 31/36 3.5 4.0 64.0% 68.9% 50.4% 47.4% 54.2% 62.3% 47.2% 2017 40/42 3.4 2.5 61.9% 65.3% 49.1% 54.4% 51.6% 59.1% 41.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 2/2 5.0 5.0 57.9% 60.1% 48.5% 36.8% 57.7% 55.1% 40.1%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 12/12 4.9 3.4 58.6% 62.2% 47.5% 50.8% 52.1% 56.2% 43.6%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 14/14 4.2 2.6 60.1% 67.3% 48.7% 55.8% 53.6% 59.4% 39.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 49/49 4.0 2.4 62.3% 67.1% 50.2% 54.5% 49.2% 60.6% 43.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 38/39 4.3 3.0 60.1% 67.1% 49.9% 58.3% 49.5% 60.2% 40.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 22/22 3.7 2.9 60.1% 68.2% 45.8% 55.2% 50.0% 59.0% 39.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 12/12 2.2 2.3 58.0% 64.8% 47.7% 51.0% 41.6% 57.3% 40.4%
Career — 258/290 2.6 3.8 64.6% 65.1% 48.7% 53.7% 50.1% 59.2% 45.3% — 252/266 3.7 2.9 60.5% 65.7% 48.7% 53.7% 48.8% 58.9% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Amanda Anisimova Shelby Rogers
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2017 1483 101.2 -0.25 -2.07 0.921 48.2% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 1683 142.2 +4.05 +2.84 1.199 54.1% +12 — — 68.6% +1.34 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 1765 138.6 +0.98 +4.05 1.126 52.6% -48 -32 -110 63.0% +0.84 6–7 (46%) 6–1 (86%) 104.3 +0.69 2010 1494 105.0 +0.17 +0.58 0.785 45.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.10
18 2020 1778 138.0 -0.33 +0.69 0.973 49.5% -19 -30 — 55.6% +0.18 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 98.4 -0.42 2011 1479 95.8 -4.03 -4.58 0.787 43.9% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.08
19 2021 1780 139.7 +2.46 +2.91 1.136 52.6% +8 -45 -146 51.5% +0.55 2–8 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 92.9 -1.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2022 1927 151.1 +2.94 +2.37 1.120 52.3% -73 -6 -126 65.1% +0.87 13–5 (72%) 5–2 (71%) 110.1 -2.09 2013 1478 105.2 +0.56 -2.93 0.907 49.1% — +62 — 50.0% +0.17 0–2 — — +0.53
21 2023 1794 127.1 -0.58 -0.40 0.923 48.2% -29 — — 29.4% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — -0.26 2014 1631 132.2 +1.08 -0.03 0.997 49.8% -30 -7 — 53.2% +0.15 4–1 (80%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 -0.57
22 2024 1892 146.4 +0.57 +1.45 1.010 50.3% +36 -108 — 62.3% +0.41 3–6 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.8 -1.57 2015 1528 107.8 -2.17 -3.76 0.783 44.7% +11 +55 — 28.2% -1.67 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.8 -0.14
23 2025 2115 162.2 +3.85 +2.19 1.142 52.6% +10 -238 -59 66.7% +1.09 15–4 (79%) 9–5 (64%) 113.5 -0.29 2016 1585 127.2 +2.25 +0.12 1.057 51.1% -39 +110 — 49.3% +0.09 5–8 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 97.4 +0.44
24 2026 2012 157.7 +4.35 +4.19 1.250 54.7% +43 -142 +2 60.8% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 +1.28 2017 1689 133.0 +2.26 -1.35 1.011 50.1% -50 +54 -96 52.0% +0.14 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 108.3 -1.20
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1650 103.6 -2.39 -1.26 0.893 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–2 — +0.21
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1574 111.3 -0.80 -0.46 0.996 50.1% — +121 +52 44.8% -0.31 0–7 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.20
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1680 132.2 +1.94 -0.55 0.967 49.3% +16 — — 51.5% -0.12 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 106.2 +0.47
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1805 147.1 +3.43 +1.34 1.111 52.0% +24 -149 -144 57.1% +0.48 6–10 (38%) 8–6 (57%) 96.6 -0.42
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1804 144.1 +2.94 -1.21 1.009 50.3% +44 -170 -145 52.2% -0.08 6–10 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 99.2 -1.95
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1773 137.9 +1.67 -1.25 0.951 49.1% +77 -140 — 42.6% -0.41 5–7 (42%) 0–6 (0%) 92.1 -1.29
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1676 122.2 -0.04 -0.79 0.948 48.6% +36 -21 — 32.0% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.39
Career — 2126 156.9 +2.36 +2.51 1.111 52.2% -1 -68 -83 61.2% +0.77 49–44 (53%) 32–25 (56%) 106.2 -1.30 — 1856 140.0 +1.85 -0.58 1.004 50.0% +8 -8 -100 48.9% -0.10 41–61 (40%) 39–36 (52%) 94.4 -1.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.