H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ana Bogdan vs Kirsten Flipkens H2H: 1-2
Kirsten Flipkens holds a 2–1 lead over Ana Bogdan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kirsten Flipkens leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Ana Bogdan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ana Bogdan won the 2019 Istanbul third round 6-1 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 40
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2019* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ana Bogdan | 6-1 1-0 (ret.) | Kirsten Flipkens | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2017* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Kirsten Flipkens | 6-1 7-6(1) | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2016* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kirsten Flipkens | 7-6(7) 6-3 | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,830 | 95 | 114 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kirsten Flipkens | #531 | #13 | 2,961 | 1,829 | 198 | 221 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ana Bogdan | Kirsten Flipkens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #76 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–4 | 76.5% | #54 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #56 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #69 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #65 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #74 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,608 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #86 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |