H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Anastasia Rodionova vs Svetlana Kuznetsova H2H: 1-3

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 3–1 lead over Anastasia Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Anastasia Rodionova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anastasia Rodionova won the 2010 Wimbledon second round 6-4 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Rodionova
AUS Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 24, 2010* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Anastasia Rodionova #74 6-4 2-6 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #19 Match data
Jan 20, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #3 6-1 6-2 Anastasia Rodionova #95 Match data
Jan 21, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #8 6-2 3-6 6-3 Anastasia Rodionova #99 Match data
Sep 2, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #7 6-3 6-0 Anastasia Rodionova #98 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,649 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Rodionova Svetlana Kuznetsova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2
19 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,468 0 0 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5
20 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,521 0 0 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5
21 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,546 0 0 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8
22 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,530 0 0 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9
23 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,517 0 0 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9
24 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,526 0 0 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12
25 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,525 0 0 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13
26 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,503 0 0 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13
27 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,522 0 0 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13
28 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,606 0 0 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13
29 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,573 0 0 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14
30 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,539 0 0 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15
31 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,502 0 0 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17
32 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,514 0 0 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18
34 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,476 0 0 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18
35 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,485 0 0 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18
36 — — — — — — — 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18