H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Anastasija Sevastova vs Irina Bara H2H: 2-0
Anastasija Sevastova holds a 2–0 lead over Irina Bara in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anastasija Sevastova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2019 Jurmala quarterfinal 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 31
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2019* | Jurmala | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Irina Bara | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2018* | Moscow River Cup | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | Irina Bara | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Irina Bara | #463 | #104 | 722 | 1,620 | 16 | 34 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasija Sevastova | Irina Bara | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #119 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #175 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |