H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anett Kontaveit vs Ashleigh Barty H2H: 0-2
Ashleigh Barty holds a 2–0 lead over Anett Kontaveit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ashleigh Barty leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2019 Cincinnati fourth round 4-6 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 30
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2019* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Ashleigh Barty | 4-6 7-5 7-5 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2019* | Miami | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Ashleigh Barty | 6-3 6-3 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Ashleigh Barty | #1 | #1 | 10,185 | 2,199 | 191 | 70 | 73.2% | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anett Kontaveit | Ashleigh Barty | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #190 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #223 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #272 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #17 | 1,888 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,964 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 48–12 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,070 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 12–3 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,082 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 43–7 | 86.0% | #1 | 2,142 | 2 | 13 |
| 26 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 | 2022 | 11–0 | 100.0% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 15 |
| 27 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |