H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anett Kontaveit vs Yaroslava Shvedova H2H: 1-0
Anett Kontaveit holds a 1–0 lead over Yaroslava Shvedova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anett Kontaveit leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anett Kontaveit won the 2016 Shenzhen third round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2016* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 6-4 7-6(5) | Yaroslava Shvedova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Yaroslava Shvedova | #1,136 | #25 | 1,860 | 1,751 | 141 | 175 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anett Kontaveit | Yaroslava Shvedova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #92 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #204 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #65 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #289 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #434 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |