H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:17 UTC
Anna Kalinskaya vs Katerina Siniakova H2H: 3-0
Anna Kalinskaya holds a 3–0 lead over Katerina Siniakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna Kalinskaya leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna Kalinskaya won the 2026 Rome second round 4-6 7-6(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Anna Kalinskaya | 4-6 7-6(4) 7-5 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2024* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anna Kalinskaya | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2023* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anna Kalinskaya | 6-4 6-2 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| Feb 6, 2016 | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Katerina Siniakova | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Anna Kalinskaya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Kalinskaya | #20 | #11 | 2,975 | 1,957 | 134 | 122 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Kalinskaya | Katerina Siniakova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #114 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2021 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #111 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2022 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2023 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2024 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2025 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,885 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2026 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,903 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 |