H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 1-1
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova and Agnieszka Radwanska are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Karolina Schmiedlova won the 2015 Cincinnati second round 4-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 31
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2015* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2015* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-4 7-5 | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | #379 | #26 | 1,875 | 1,792 | 115 | 162 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #83 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2014 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #73 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2015 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–22 | 12.0% | #227 | 1,486 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2018 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 2022 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 |
| 28 | 2023 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 |
| 29 | 2024 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 |