H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova vs Anna-Lena Friedsam H2H: 0-1
Anna-Lena Friedsam holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Karolina Schmiedlova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Friedsam leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna-Lena Friedsam won the 2016 Rome second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 31
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2016* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Anna-Lena Friedsam | 6-4 7-5 | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | #379 | #26 | 1,875 | 1,792 | 115 | 162 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | #227 | #45 | 1,160 | 1,740 | 61 | 83 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Anna-Lena Friedsam | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #83 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #73 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–22 | 12.0% | #227 | 1,486 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #483 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #111 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #135 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |