H2H data updated: 2026-07-15 16:32 UTC
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 0-2
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 2–0 lead over Anna-Lena Friedsam in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2016 Australian Open fourth round 6-7 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-7 6-1 7-5 | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2016* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-2 6-4 | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | #227 | #45 | 1,160 | 1,740 | 61 | 83 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2015 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #483 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #111 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 |
| 28 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #135 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |