H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Daria Saville H2H: 1-1
Anna-Lena Friedsam and Daria Saville are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Friedsam leads 1–0 on clay, while Daria Saville leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daria Saville won the 2023 Guangzhou third round 3-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 32
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2023* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Daria Saville | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data |
| May 18, 2022* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Anna-Lena Friedsam | 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | Daria Saville | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | #227 | #45 | 1,160 | 1,740 | 61 | 83 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,836 | 156 | 153 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Daria Saville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #25 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #483 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #111 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #135 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |