H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Vitalia Diatchenko H2H: 1-1
Anna-Lena Friedsam and Vitalia Diatchenko are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Friedsam leads 1–0 on grass, while Vitalia Diatchenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vitalia Diatchenko won the 2022 Lyon third round 6-3 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2022* | Lyon | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Vitalia Diatchenko | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data |
| Jul 1, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Anna-Lena Friedsam | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Vitalia Diatchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | #227 | #45 | 1,160 | 1,740 | 61 | 83 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vitalia Diatchenko | #438 | #71 | 791 | 1,624 | 14 | 49 | 22.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Vitalia Diatchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #133 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #130 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #81 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #483 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #111 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #90 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #135 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #137 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #179 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |