H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Arina Rodionova vs Ana Konjuh H2H: 0-1
Ana Konjuh holds a 1–0 lead over Arina Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ana Konjuh leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ana Konjuh won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 28
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2022 | Rome | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Ana Konjuh | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | Arina Rodionova | Match data |
| May 24, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Ana Konjuh | 6-2 6-3 | Arina Rodionova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arina Rodionova | #439 | #97 | 761 | 1,560 | 17 | 46 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ana Konjuh | #647 | #20 | 1,830 | 1,786 | 84 | 80 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arina Rodionova | Ana Konjuh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #93 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #47 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #44 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1282 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #169 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #152 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |