H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Arina Rodionova vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 1-0
Arina Rodionova holds a 1–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arina Rodionova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Arina Rodionova won the 2011 Birmingham second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2011* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Arina Rodionova | 6-4 6-4 | Virginie Razzano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arina Rodionova | #439 | #97 | 761 | 1,560 | 17 | 46 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Virginie Razzano | #1,226 | #16 | 2,420 | 1,876 | 200 | 216 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arina Rodionova | Virginie Razzano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #143 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #51 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #58 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #19 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2017 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #169 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2021 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #152 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #200 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |