H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Arina Rodionova vs Xinyun Han H2H: 0-1
Xinyun Han holds a 1–0 lead over Arina Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Xinyun Han leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Xinyun Han won the 2017 Nanchang quarterfinal 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2017* | Nanchang | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Xinyun Han | 6-1 7-5 | Arina Rodionova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arina Rodionova | #439 | #97 | 761 | 1,560 | 17 | 46 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Xinyun Han | #1,386 | #105 | 597 | 1,565 | 21 | 33 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Arina Rodionova | Xinyun Han | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #339 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #324 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #169 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #159 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #187 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #152 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |