H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Ashleigh Barty vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 1-0
Ashleigh Barty holds a 1–0 lead over Agnieszka Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ashleigh Barty leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2017 Wuhan fourth round 4-6 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 30
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2017* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Ashleigh Barty | 4-6 6-0 6-4 | Agnieszka Radwanska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashleigh Barty | #1 | #1 | 10,185 | 2,199 | 191 | 70 | 73.2% | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15 |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ashleigh Barty | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #190 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #223 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #272 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #17 | 1,888 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2018 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,964 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2019 | 48–12 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,070 | 1 | 7 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2020 | 12–3 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,082 | 1 | 8 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 2021 | 43–7 | 86.0% | #1 | 2,142 | 2 | 13 | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | 2022 | 11–0 | 100.0% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 15 | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 |