H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Ashleigh Barty vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 1-0

Ashleigh Barty holds a 1–0 lead over Agnieszka Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ashleigh Barty leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2017 Wuhan Open third round 4-6 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ashleigh Barty
AUS Age 30 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Agnieszka Radwanska
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ashleigh Barty #37 4-6 6-0 6-4 Agnieszka Radwanska #13 Match data Sep 28, 2017* R16 Wuhan Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ashleigh Barty #1 #1 10,185 2,180 197 72 73.2% 3 3 2 5 2 15
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,103 513 241 68.0% 0 5 1 7 7 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ashleigh Barty Agnieszka Radwanska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2012 0–4 0.0% #175 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2013 4–5 44.4% #190 1,519 0 0 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,672 0 0
18 2014 1–6 14.3% #223 1,510 0 0 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,809 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2008 52–20 72.2% #10 1,914 0 4
20 2016 2–1 66.7% #272 1,595 0 0 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,912 0 4
21 2017 30–14 68.2% #17 1,891 0 1 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,862 0 4
22 2018 42–19 68.9% #15 1,973 0 3 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,980 0 7
23 2019 52–12 81.2% #1 2,082 1 7 2012 59–20 74.7% #4 1,988 0 10
24 2020 12–3 80.0% #1 2,083 1 8 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,966 0 13
25 2021 43–8 84.3% #1 2,117 2 13 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,877 0 14
26 2022 11–0 100.0% #1 2,180 3 15 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,961 0 17
27 — — — — — — — 2016 53–19 73.6% #3 1,980 0 20
28 — — — — — — — 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,823 0 20
29 — — — — — — — 2018 15–14 51.7% #74 1,752 0 20

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ashleigh Barty Agnieszka Radwanska
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2013 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
18 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 18 10 28 64.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 30 14 44 68.2% 14 5 19 73.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
20 2016 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2009 28 16 44 63.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2017 22 9 31 71.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2010 25 12 37 67.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 2018 25 11 36 69.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 2011 36 12 48 75.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
23 2019 33 9 42 78.6% 11 2 13 84.6% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2012 41 13 54 75.9% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
24 2020 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 46 15 61 75.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2021 22 4 26 84.6% 14 4 18 77.8% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — — 2014 31 16 47 66.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
26 2022 11 0 11 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 36 16 52 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 43 13 56 76.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 20 14 34 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
Career — 129 46 175 73.7% 35 17 52 67.3% 33 9 42 78.6% — — — — — 370 166 536 69.0% 75 45 120 62.5% 66 28 94 70.2% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 243/269 of Ashleigh Barty's and 651/755 of Agnieszka Radwanska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ashleigh Barty Agnieszka Radwanska
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2012 4/4 2.8 5.3 58.7% 60.8% 32.7% 35.0% 43.3% 49.0% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2013 6/9 3.5 2.7 54.3% 65.7% 50.2% 36.3% 44.9% 58.4% 37.5% 2006 10/19 1.8 1.6 65.4% 59.8% 46.5% 60.6% 47.1% 55.1% 46.0%
18 2014 4/7 3.0 3.8 57.5% 63.1% 50.5% 57.1% 56.5% 57.6% 32.7% 2007 41/46 2.0 1.8 60.6% 62.9% 47.7% 57.5% 43.5% 57.3% 44.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 59/72 1.4 1.4 67.0% 63.2% 46.8% 50.4% 54.4% 57.9% 49.2%
20 2016 3/3 6.7 3.7 65.2% 73.9% 47.4% 68.3% 35.5% 64.7% 43.8% 2009 64/67 1.5 1.5 66.3% 62.9% 48.9% 52.1% 56.0% 58.2% 48.9%
21 2017 41/44 5.0 2.9 60.9% 72.5% 50.3% 58.9% 51.7% 63.6% 44.1% 2010 49/50 1.6 1.2 65.6% 64.1% 50.5% 51.5% 47.9% 59.2% 48.8%
22 2018 58/61 4.9 2.9 58.4% 71.9% 53.7% 53.1% 47.3% 64.3% 42.6% 2011 56/64 2.3 1.2 67.1% 64.4% 51.4% 58.4% 54.0% 59.9% 49.6%
23 2019 54/64 6.5 3.2 57.5% 73.7% 52.1% 54.7% 47.4% 64.4% 45.3% 2012 68/79 2.4 1.2 67.3% 66.3% 46.7% 56.9% 56.1% 59.9% 49.0%
24 2020 14/15 5.6 1.9 60.7% 73.5% 49.9% 60.4% 53.0% 64.4% 44.0% 2013 69/76 2.4 1.6 64.9% 65.6% 50.7% 55.0% 53.1% 60.4% 48.1%
25 2021 48/51 6.7 3.3 58.8% 75.8% 49.4% 59.3% 48.7% 64.8% 46.0% 2014 60/65 2.4 1.3 65.5% 63.3% 48.2% 56.8% 52.0% 58.2% 49.8%
26 2022 11/11 7.0 1.7 60.3% 81.1% 58.6% 90.0% 60.2% 72.2% 48.2% 2015 49/72 2.5 1.3 66.7% 68.4% 51.3% 56.8% 54.6% 62.7% 46.7%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 60/73 2.8 1.8 62.4% 67.3% 47.7% 60.1% 57.3% 60.0% 49.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 42/43 2.0 1.6 61.8% 64.9% 45.8% 53.6% 46.7% 57.5% 46.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 24/29 1.4 1.9 60.8% 59.8% 44.2% 45.6% 42.6% 53.4% 43.2%
Career — 243/269 5.7 3.0 58.9% 73.2% 51.4% 57.3% 49.1% 64.2% 44.0% — 651/755 2.1 1.5 65.1% 64.6% 48.5% 55.1% 52.4% 59.0% 48.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ashleigh Barty Agnieszka Radwanska
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2012 1469 97.5 -1.40 -1.92 0.627 41.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2013 1519 110.4 +0.25 -1.62 0.902 47.5% +1 — — 47.6% -1.05 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.14 2006 1673 141.6 +0.60 +1.54 1.026 50.8% -31 -111 +25 58.1% +0.40 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.3 -0.39
18 2014 1510 114.8 +1.59 -1.59 0.772 46.2% +7 — — 23.1% -2.15 0–1 0–1 — -0.81 2007 1810 145.1 +1.25 +1.05 1.037 50.9% -9 -215 -55 57.7% +0.58 8–8 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 104.1 -0.85
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1914 152.0 +2.51 +4.81 1.167 53.4% -49 -105 +11 66.0% +1.18 14–7 (67%) 7–7 (50%) 104.2 +0.97
20 2016 1595 108.1 -0.11 +1.91 1.241 53.2% — — +26 57.1% +1.57 1–0 0–2 — -0.09 2009 1913 151.3 +2.63 +4.78 1.172 53.5% -27 -59 +42 62.8% +0.99 11–9 (55%) 4–10 (29%) 92.8 +1.49
21 2017 1892 150.0 +6.11 +1.57 1.211 54.0% -27 -297 -172 61.4% +1.02 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 111.0 -1.16 2010 1862 156.5 +3.54 +5.02 1.197 53.9% +37 -47 +77 66.0% +1.38 2–8 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 91.3 +2.07
22 2018 1973 151.5 +6.83 +0.72 1.194 53.1% -6 -281 -148 65.4% +1.08 10–3 (77%) 4–3 (57%) 108.4 -0.44 2011 1980 161.2 +4.42 +6.19 1.237 54.8% +22 -148 -85 67.3% +1.27 12–11 (52%) 6–9 (40%) 94.9 +2.26
23 2019 2083 165.1 +6.89 +3.36 1.272 54.6% +1 -186 -124 71.9% +1.58 19–6 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 107.5 -1.06 2012 1989 163.4 +4.85 +5.61 1.223 54.4% +44 -42 -81 72.4% +1.53 11–7 (61%) 5–3 (63%) 99.8 +0.14
24 2020 2084 154.1 +5.09 +2.45 1.236 54.3% -5 — — 67.6% +1.59 5–1 (83%) 2–3 (40%) 100.7 -0.69 2013 1966 161.1 +5.04 +4.68 1.217 54.2% +44 -43 -7 70.9% +1.54 10–5 (67%) 12–5 (71%) 103.6 +1.71
25 2021 2118 162.9 +7.48 +3.74 1.306 55.3% +19 -82 +83 77.0% +1.89 14–3 (82%) 7–4 (64%) 110.2 -0.67 2014 1877 160.3 +2.22 +5.84 1.190 53.9% +20 +68 +42 63.6% +1.24 8–7 (53%) 7–5 (58%) 99.1 +1.73
26 2022 2181 159.7 +8.99 +4.21 1.735 59.8% +42 — — 95.7% +3.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.08 2015 1962 156.6 +4.09 +5.26 1.249 54.7% +2 -94 -3 67.3% +1.52 9–13 (41%) 3–6 (33%) 90.4 -0.24
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1980 161.7 +4.05 +6.47 1.245 54.9% +48 -113 -53 72.2% +1.73 8–10 (44%) 8–6 (57%) 94.0 +0.07
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1823 139.7 +1.38 +2.93 1.090 51.9% +30 +27 +110 57.7% +0.56 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 94.9 +1.52
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1752 134.0 -1.95 +0.83 0.927 48.2% +14 — +160 47.6% -0.17 7–2 (78%) 4–1 (80%) 107.0 -0.80
Career — 2181 161.7 +6.38 +2.18 1.228 53.9% -1 -180 -96 67.3% +1.27 62–22 (74%) 29–22 (57%) 115.6 -2.03 — 2104 161.3 +3.16 +4.74 1.175 53.6% +16 -74 +8 65.6% +1.20 107–96 (53%) 70–61 (53%) 95.2 +1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.