H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ashleigh Barty vs Johanna Konta H2H: 3-1
Ashleigh Barty holds a 3–1 lead over Johanna Konta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Ashleigh Barty leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2018 Wuhan second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 30
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2018* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ashleigh Barty | 7-5 6-4 | Johanna Konta | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2018* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Ashleigh Barty | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Johanna Konta | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2017* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ashleigh Barty | 6-0 4-6 7-6(3) | Johanna Konta | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2017* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Johanna Konta | 6-3 7-5 | Ashleigh Barty | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashleigh Barty | #1 | #1 | 10,185 | 2,199 | 191 | 70 | 73.2% | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15 |
| Johanna Konta | #113 | #4 | 5,110 | 1,990 | 174 | 120 | 59.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ashleigh Barty | Johanna Konta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #190 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #223 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #272 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #17 | 1,888 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,964 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 48–12 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,070 | 1 | 7 | 2014 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 12–3 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,082 | 1 | 8 | 2015 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #48 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 43–7 | 86.0% | #1 | 2,142 | 2 | 13 | 2016 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #10 | 1,854 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 11–0 | 100.0% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 15 | 2017 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #9 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #37 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #14 | 1,825 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #113 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 |