H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ashleigh Barty vs Maria Sharapova H2H: 2-2
Ashleigh Barty and Maria Sharapova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ashleigh Barty leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Maria Sharapova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2019 Cincinnati third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 30
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2019* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ashleigh Barty | 6-4 6-1 | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2019* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Ashleigh Barty | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
| May 16, 2018* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Maria Sharapova | 7-5 3-6 6-2 | Ashleigh Barty | Match data |
| Jan 3, 2014* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Maria Sharapova | (def.) | Ashleigh Barty | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashleigh Barty | #1 | #1 | 10,185 | 2,199 | 191 | 70 | 73.2% | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15 |
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,238 | 596 | 174 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ashleigh Barty | Maria Sharapova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #190 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,063 | 1 | 7 |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #223 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,068 | 1 | 10 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,210 | 2 | 15 |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #272 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,113 | 2 | 16 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #17 | 1,888 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,098 | 3 | 19 |
| 22 | 2018 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,964 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,050 | 3 | 20 |
| 23 | 2019 | 48–12 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,070 | 1 | 7 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,981 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 2020 | 12–3 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,082 | 1 | 8 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,993 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | 2021 | 43–7 | 86.0% | #1 | 2,142 | 2 | 13 | 2012 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #2 | 2,155 | 4 | 27 |
| 26 | 2022 | 11–0 | 100.0% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 15 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,136 | 4 | 29 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,093 | 5 | 33 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,044 | 5 | 35 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,049 | 5 | 35 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 1,976 | 5 | 36 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,929 | 5 | 36 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,858 | 5 | 36 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,820 | 5 | 36 |