H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 04:32 UTC
Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Anna Karolina Schmiedlova H2H: 1-0
Beatriz Haddad Maia holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Karolina Schmiedlova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Beatriz Haddad Maia won the 2019 Bogota fourth round 7-6(3) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 31
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2019* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 7-6(3) 7-6(6) | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | #379 | #26 | 1,875 | 1,792 | 115 | 162 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #83 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #73 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–22 | 12.0% | #227 | 1,486 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |