H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Maria Herazo H2H: 1-0
Beatriz Haddad Maia holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Herazo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Beatriz Haddad Maia won the 2015 Bogota third round 6-3 2-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
COL
Left-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2015* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 6-3 2-6 7-6(2) | Maria Herazo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Maria Herazo | #649 | #317 | 158 | 1,500 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | Maria Herazo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1210 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #416 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |