H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Shuai Zhang H2H: 2-0

Beatriz Haddad Maia holds a 2–0 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Beatriz Haddad Maia won the 2022 Birmingham final 5-4 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Beatriz Haddad Maia
Brazil Age 30 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Shuai Zhang
China Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shuai Zhang #73 6-4 6-2 Beatriz Haddad Maia #78 Match data May 16, 2026 Q1 Q Strasbourg Open WTA 500 Clay
Beatriz Haddad Maia #32 5-4 (ret.) Shuai Zhang #54 Match data Jun 19, 2022* F Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Beatriz Haddad Maia #64 6-3 6-2 Shuai Zhang #30 Match data Mar 23, 2018* R64 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Beatriz Haddad Maia #154 #10 3,194 1,939 148 136 52.1% 0 0 1 1 2 4
Shuai Zhang #54 #22 1,905 1,857 232 294 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Shuai Zhang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2013 1–1 50.0% #299 1,501 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #203 1,495 0 0
18 2014 0–2 0.0% #239 1,475 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #149 1,464 0 0
19 2015 3–2 60.0% #246 1,508 0 0 2008 0–6 0.0% #235 1,412 0 0
20 2016 0–3 0.0% #174 1,459 0 0 2009 2–1 66.7% #154 1,467 0 0
21 2017 14–12 53.8% #71 1,658 0 0 2010 3–4 42.9% #90 1,492 0 0
22 2018 5–9 35.7% #183 1,579 0 0 2011 8–22 26.7% #126 1,445 0 0
23 2019 7–5 58.3% #121 1,671 0 0 2012 2–6 25.0% #127 1,457 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2013 9–4 69.2% #52 1,598 0 1
25 2021 2–2 50.0% #83 1,635 0 0 2014 18–24 42.9% #61 1,600 0 1
26 2022 34–21 61.8% #15 1,829 0 2 2015 4–12 25.0% #139 1,518 0 1
27 2023 32–21 60.4% #11 1,894 0 3 2016 26–21 55.3% #23 1,774 0 1
28 2024 34–25 57.6% #17 1,889 0 4 2017 23–24 48.9% #36 1,774 0 2
29 2025 16–22 42.1% #58 1,768 0 4 2018 28–27 50.9% #40 1,726 0 2
30 2026 0–11 0.0% #154 1,536 0 4 2019 18–23 43.9% #40 1,681 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2020 12–10 54.5% #35 1,733 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2021 15–24 38.5% #60 1,631 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2022 34–26 56.7% #25 1,733 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2023 4–18 18.2% #245 1,524 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2024 5–12 29.4% #205 1,574 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2025 10–7 58.8% #81 1,731 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 2026 11–19 36.7% #54 1,698 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Shuai Zhang
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2015 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 2017 8 6 14 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2018 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 7 17 24 29.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2019 3 3 6 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2022 19 16 35 54.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 13 2 15 86.7% 2015 1 6 7 14.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2023 18 14 32 56.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2016 24 15 39 61.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2024 24 16 40 60.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 2017 18 14 32 56.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2025 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 2018 22 19 41 53.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2026 0 7 7 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 11 15 26 42.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 6 13 19 31.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 22 15 37 59.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 7 9 16 43.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 88 88 176 50.0% 34 32 66 51.5% 26 16 42 61.9% — 168 191 359 46.8% 38 72 110 34.5% 26 31 57 45.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 267/284 of Beatriz Haddad Maia's and 495/529 of Shuai Zhang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Shuai Zhang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2013 2/2 1.5 2.0 67.4% 65.8% 49.0% 81.8% 62.7% 60.5% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 2/2 1.0 2.5 67.9% 54.9% 17.6% 48.8% 31.3% 43.0% 37.4% 2007 1/3 0.0 2.0 55.8% 62.1% 39.1% 42.9% 100.0% 51.9% 22.7%
19 2015 5/5 3.4 1.8 59.9% 67.9% 55.8% 51.8% 41.6% 62.9% 50.2% 2008 6/6 0.8 3.2 68.8% 53.0% 45.1% 47.6% 38.3% 50.3% 38.5%
20 2016 3/3 1.3 7.3 58.4% 58.0% 29.2% 44.6% 40.3% 45.7% 36.2% 2009 2/3 0.0 4.0 65.6% 47.9% 49.0% 39.4% 37.9% 48.5% 42.7%
21 2017 26/26 1.6 3.6 68.1% 65.7% 47.9% 57.3% 43.6% 60.1% 42.2% 2010 6/7 0.2 5.3 72.2% 51.8% 31.0% 48.7% 46.7% 46.1% 42.2%
22 2018 14/14 1.7 4.2 65.1% 63.5% 40.5% 38.9% 52.0% 55.5% 40.0% 2011 28/30 0.6 2.5 69.3% 54.9% 39.3% 47.4% 41.5% 50.2% 39.4%
23 2019 12/12 2.1 4.9 72.9% 65.6% 47.3% 68.8% 38.1% 60.3% 42.3% 2012 8/8 1.1 3.0 64.8% 56.8% 35.6% 43.8% 44.0% 49.6% 41.2%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 11/13 1.5 1.5 64.9% 68.1% 47.0% 62.4% 49.6% 60.4% 48.0%
25 2021 4/4 1.5 2.5 62.1% 57.5% 39.1% 50.8% 48.2% 50.3% 44.4% 2014 38/42 1.2 1.9 68.5% 57.4% 45.2% 51.5% 49.8% 53.8% 43.0%
26 2022 51/55 2.9 4.1 64.9% 67.4% 46.8% 57.2% 43.8% 60.3% 41.5% 2015 14/16 1.6 2.8 66.9% 60.1% 45.8% 51.2% 59.4% 55.0% 42.9%
27 2023 52/53 2.2 2.9 69.4% 63.5% 49.6% 54.2% 45.7% 59.4% 42.7% 2016 38/50 0.9 1.7 66.2% 58.7% 48.2% 49.5% 56.1% 55.2% 45.5%
28 2024 57/59 2.2 3.4 64.0% 66.5% 47.2% 56.4% 50.9% 59.4% 43.3% 2017 44/47 2.9 2.7 63.5% 65.5% 43.9% 54.0% 49.5% 57.6% 44.3%
29 2025 28/38 2.2 5.0 64.6% 62.1% 43.4% 51.9% 39.3% 55.3% 41.1% 2018 55/55 2.3 2.6 63.7% 63.6% 46.9% 52.4% 47.8% 57.3% 43.7%
30 2026 11/11 0.9 5.5 63.2% 56.8% 30.5% 41.9% 35.3% 47.5% 38.7% 2019 41/41 2.1 2.8 62.7% 62.5% 44.0% 51.7% 47.7% 55.7% 41.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 22/22 2.0 2.5 67.4% 61.9% 48.0% 48.9% 50.6% 57.2% 43.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 39/39 1.5 2.9 64.7% 59.8% 43.1% 53.0% 43.0% 54.0% 39.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 58/60 2.1 2.2 65.7% 64.3% 48.1% 45.8% 47.7% 58.8% 42.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 22/22 1.2 2.9 61.1% 57.6% 39.6% 41.4% 52.3% 50.6% 37.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 17/17 1.5 2.1 64.9% 61.4% 43.5% 45.0% 40.9% 55.0% 39.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 15/18 2.6 2.9 67.0% 60.0% 39.9% 39.2% 47.8% 53.4% 45.4%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 30/30 1.4 2.1 68.8% 60.1% 47.4% 54.3% 41.8% 56.1% 39.5%
Career — 267/284 2.2 3.8 66.0% 64.7% 45.9% 54.6% 45.1% 58.2% 42.1% — 495/530 1.7 2.5 65.6% 60.9% 44.8% 49.9% 48.0% 55.3% 42.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Shuai Zhang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2013 1501 105.4 -1.64 -0.18 1.211 55.0% — — — 60.0% +1.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.23 2006 1495 104.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.25
18 2014 1475 92.2 -4.60 -4.21 0.656 40.4% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.07 2007 1464 103.0 -1.60 +0.26 0.473 38.5% +16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.21
19 2015 1509 112.3 +3.07 +1.80 1.352 55.7% — +60 — 66.7% +1.33 1–0 1–1 — +0.11 2008 1413 101.8 -1.83 -2.28 0.775 44.3% +21 — — 14.3% -2.21 0–2 0–2 — -0.06
20 2016 1460 88.8 -3.89 -3.72 0.667 40.8% — — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.37 2009 1468 120.7 +2.65 +2.50 0.830 45.6% +21 — — 66.7% +0.33 — 1–0 — -0.05
21 2017 1658 123.3 +3.22 -1.30 1.058 51.2% -37 -29 -31 55.0% +0.32 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 95.7 -0.58 2010 1492 103.6 -3.51 -1.21 0.783 44.3% +26 — — 37.5% -1.19 2–0 1–1 — +0.51
22 2018 1579 120.0 -0.85 -2.40 0.899 47.7% +10 — — 41.4% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.9 -0.26 2011 1445 108.6 -4.27 -3.16 0.790 44.9% +24 +34 — 30.8% -1.57 3–4 (43%) 1–6 (14%) 96.1 -0.05
23 2019 1672 123.2 +2.60 -1.74 1.063 51.7% -10 -26 — 58.6% +0.72 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 97.0 0.00 2012 1457 113.5 -2.34 +0.08 0.817 45.5% +14 — — 23.5% -1.71 1–0 0–1 — -0.17
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1599 123.5 +2.33 +1.26 1.212 54.5% -6 — — 70.4% +1.52 0–1 2–0 — +0.48
25 2021 1635 117.7 -2.24 +2.12 0.893 47.8% +29 — — 55.6% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.14 2014 1600 117.2 -1.75 -0.53 0.931 48.5% -53 -65 +35 42.9% -0.46 10–6 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.61
26 2022 1830 142.7 +2.95 -0.63 1.044 50.8% -55 -59 +126 53.6% +0.22 16–7 (70%) 9–2 (82%) 112.2 +0.02 2015 1518 110.7 -2.05 -0.11 0.952 48.8% -20 -5 — 33.3% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.0 -0.54
27 2023 1895 151.9 +3.13 +0.69 1.052 50.8% -30 +20 +20 55.7% +0.41 16–8 (67%) 15–11 (58%) 107.1 -0.54 2016 1775 138.9 -0.62 +2.34 1.016 50.3% +20 -282 — 52.6% +0.18 8–1 (89%) 5–6 (45%) 106.8 -0.50
28 2024 1889 148.0 +2.61 +0.61 1.067 51.4% +4 -23 +13 57.3% +0.50 10–9 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 101.7 +1.85 2017 1775 137.4 +0.89 +0.70 1.045 51.0% +50 -290 -233 50.9% +0.34 8–10 (44%) 7–8 (47%) 99.0 +0.05
29 2025 1769 129.5 -1.12 -1.17 0.918 48.1% -33 +49 +112 44.6% -0.42 7–9 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 95.9 +1.80 2018 1727 132.0 +0.70 +0.72 1.025 50.7% +26 -168 — 52.4% +0.02 5–9 (36%) 9–8 (53%) 96.6 +2.55
30 2026 1537 108.1 -5.46 -3.73 0.737 43.0% +43 +131 — 15.4% -2.46 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.5 +0.23 2019 1682 131.5 -0.59 -1.30 0.946 49.1% -17 -99 -24 47.7% -0.17 4–6 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.27
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1733 131.8 0.00 +0.35 1.003 50.0% -62 -39 — 52.0% -0.06 4–2 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 104.9 -0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1632 116.8 -1.99 -2.77 0.869 47.1% -13 -16 +97 43.2% -0.80 2–5 (29%) 5–3 (63%) 97.9 +0.69
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1733 139.5 +1.53 -0.47 1.023 50.4% -6 -140 +117 53.4% +0.09 6–2 (75%) 11–8 (58%) 106.7 +1.01
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1524 112.2 -4.74 -4.13 0.755 43.8% +90 -25 +193 28.3% -1.61 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) 94.2 +0.93
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1575 131.2 -0.87 -2.36 0.873 47.3% +48 — — 35.1% -1.08 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 97.8 -0.76
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1731 134.6 -2.26 +1.21 0.975 49.2% +29 — — 50.0% -0.25 6–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 108.2 -1.06
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1698 130.8 -0.76 -1.93 0.899 47.7% +2 -169 +62 39.7% -0.74 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.8 -0.18
Career — 1939 140.7 +1.71 -0.47 1.009 50.1% -20 +7 +75 51.2% +0.07 56–52 (52%) 47–38 (55%) 101.6 +1.22 — 1858 134.2 -0.75 -0.61 0.945 48.8% +10 -114 +39 45.4% -0.37 63–66 (49%) 64–61 (51%) 103.1 +0.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.