H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Anna-Lena Friedsam H2H: 1-1
Belinda Bencic and Anna-Lena Friedsam are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Belinda Bencic leads 1–0 on grass, while Anna-Lena Friedsam leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Friedsam won the 2019 Linz third round 6-4 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2019* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anna-Lena Friedsam | 6-4 2-6 6-2 | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
| Jul 2, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Belinda Bencic | 7-5 4-6 6-0 | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | #227 | #45 | 1,160 | 1,740 | 61 | 83 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Anna-Lena Friedsam | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #483 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #111 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #135 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |