H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Leylah Fernandez H2H: 2-1
Belinda Bencic holds a 2–1 lead over Leylah Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Belinda Bencic leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Leylah Fernandez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Belinda Bencic won the 2023 Miami second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 23
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2023* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 6-1 6-1 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2022* | Guadalajara 2 | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 7-5 6-7(10) 6-3 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
| May 28, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Leylah Fernandez | 7-5 3-6 7-5 | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Leylah Fernandez | #25 | #13 | 2,605 | 1,929 | 145 | 119 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Leylah Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #434 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #88 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #35 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #31 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,909 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #25 | 1,754 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |