H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Paula Badosa H2H: 1-3
Paula Badosa holds a 3–1 lead over Belinda Bencic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Paula Badosa leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Belinda Bencic won the 2022 Charleston quarterfinal 2-6 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2022* | Charleston | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Belinda Bencic | 2-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | Paula Badosa | Match data |
| Jan 14, 2022* | Sydney | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Paula Badosa | 7-6(6) 3-6 6-3 | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
| May 6, 2021* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Paula Badosa | 6-4 7-5 | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
| Apr 8, 2021* | Charleston 1 | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Paula Badosa | 6-2 6-7(2) 6-1 | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Paula Badosa | #115 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,040 | 171 | 112 | 60.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Paula Badosa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #97 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | 2026 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,876 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |