H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Belinda Bencic vs Svetlana Kuznetsova H2H: 4-2

Belinda Bencic holds a 4–2 lead over Svetlana Kuznetsova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Belinda Bencic leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Belinda Bencic won the 2021 Australian Open second round 7-5 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Belinda Bencic
SUI Age 29 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 11, 2021* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Belinda Bencic #12 7-5 2-6 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #37 Match data
Feb 28, 2020* Doha WTA 1000 QF Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #46 6-4 6-4 Belinda Bencic #9 Match data
Feb 14, 2020* St. Petersburg WTA 500 R16 Hard Belinda Bencic #5 7-6(4) 6-4 Svetlana Kuznetsova #49 Match data
May 7, 2019* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Belinda Bencic #18 7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 Svetlana Kuznetsova #101 Match data
Sep 27, 2016* Wuhan WTA 1000 R64 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #10 6-3 3-4 (ret.) Belinda Bencic #40 Match data
Sep 18, 2014* Tokyo WTA 500 R32 Hard Belinda Bencic #34 6-3 6-0 Svetlana Kuznetsova #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Belinda Bencic #14 #4 4,745 2,032 298 187 61.4% 0 2 0 7 0 9
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Belinda Bencic Svetlana Kuznetsova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2012 0–1 0.0% #612 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2013 2–3 40.0% #184 1,512 0 0 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0
17 2014 18–17 51.4% #32 1,697 0 0 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2
18 2015 40–21 65.6% #14 1,886 0 2 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2
19 2016 17–20 45.9% #43 1,687 0 2 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5
20 2017 3–8 27.3% #98 1,686 0 2 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5
21 2018 12–13 48.0% #54 1,723 0 2 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8
22 2019 48–21 69.6% #8 1,923 0 4 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9
23 2020 7–7 50.0% #12 1,850 0 4 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9
24 2021 28–19 59.6% #23 1,848 0 4 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12
25 2022 38–19 66.7% #12 1,884 0 5 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13
26 2023 31–13 70.5% #17 1,921 0 7 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13
27 — — — — — — — 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13
28 2025 36–16 69.2% #11 2,004 0 9 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13
29 2026 18–9 66.7% #14 1,998 0 9 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14
30 — — — — — — — 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15
31 — — — — — — — 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17
32 — — — — — — — 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17
33 — — — — — — — 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18
34 — — — — — — — 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18
35 — — — — — — — 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18
36 — — — — — — — 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18