H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Yifan Xu H2H: 1-0
Belinda Bencic holds a 1–0 lead over Yifan Xu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Belinda Bencic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Belinda Bencic won the 2015 Tokyo third round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2015* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 6-0 6-0 | Yifan Xu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Yifan Xu | #1,170 | #148 | 350 | 1,500 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Belinda Bencic | Yifan Xu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #427 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #358 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |