H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Cagla Buyukakcay vs Lara Arruabarrena H2H: 1-2
Lara Arruabarrena holds a 2–1 lead over Cagla Buyukakcay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lara Arruabarrena leads 2–0 on clay, while Cagla Buyukakcay leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lara Arruabarrena won the 2015 Charleston second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUR
Age 36
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2015* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Lara Arruabarrena | 6-2 6-2 | Cagla Buyukakcay | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2015* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Cagla Buyukakcay | 6-4 6-3 | Lara Arruabarrena | Match data |
| Jul 11, 2014* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lara Arruabarrena | 7-5 3-6 7-6(6) | Cagla Buyukakcay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cagla Buyukakcay | #373 | #60 | 980 | 1,613 | 22 | 52 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lara Arruabarrena | #1,062 | #52 | 1,083 | 1,722 | 99 | 120 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cagla Buyukakcay | Lara Arruabarrena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #126 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #83 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2017 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #160 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #155 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |