H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 04:32 UTC
Cagla Buyukakcay vs Maryna Zanevska H2H: 1-0
Cagla Buyukakcay holds a 1–0 lead over Maryna Zanevska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cagla Buyukakcay leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cagla Buyukakcay won the 2017 Istanbul third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUR
Age 36
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2017* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Cagla Buyukakcay | 6-2 6-1 | Maryna Zanevska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cagla Buyukakcay | #373 | #60 | 980 | 1,613 | 22 | 52 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Maryna Zanevska | #1,162 | #62 | 1,015 | 1,797 | 34 | 53 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Cagla Buyukakcay | Maryna Zanevska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #118 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #128 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #122 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #126 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–2 | 81.8% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #83 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #81 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #160 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #251 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |