H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Camila Giorgi holds a 1–0 lead over Viktoria Hruncakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2021 Lyon first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Giorgi | 6-2 6-3 | Viktoria Hruncakova | Match data | Mar 4, 2021* | R32 | Lyon | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Viktoria Hruncakova | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Camila Giorgi | Match data | Aug 12, 2018 | Q2 | Cincinnati Open | Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,899 | 211 | 188 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Viktoria Hruncakova | #225 | #43 | 1,285 | 1,746 | 55 | 74 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Giorgi | Viktoria Hruncakova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #50 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #56 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #162 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #138 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #26 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #100 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #33 | 1,829 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,762 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Camila Giorgi | Viktoria Hruncakova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 2011 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2017 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2018 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 2013 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2019 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2014 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2020 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2021 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2022 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2023 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 26 | 2018 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 131 | 117 | 248 | 52.8% | 38 | 40 | 78 | 48.7% | 42 | 31 | 73 | 57.5% | — | 37 | 49 | 86 | 43.0% | 12 | 17 | 29 | 41.4% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 366/400 of Camila Giorgi's and 129/130 of Viktoria Hruncakova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Camila Giorgi | Viktoria Hruncakova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2011 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 53.3% | 66.7% | 28.6% | 33.3% | 0.0% | 48.9% | 26.5% | 2017 | 3/3 | 4.0 | 5.3 | 52.2% | 58.1% | 45.5% | 55.2% | 43.9% | 53.1% | 41.0% |
| 20 | 2012 | 16/16 | 1.7 | 7.4 | 53.8% | 66.1% | 42.4% | 53.5% | 42.4% | 55.1% | 43.4% | 2018 | 27/27 | 5.3 | 5.1 | 58.0% | 68.3% | 44.8% | 56.6% | 39.9% | 58.4% | 38.5% |
| 21 | 2013 | 16/19 | 2.0 | 7.7 | 56.3% | 63.1% | 45.2% | 50.3% | 46.6% | 54.9% | 42.7% | 2019 | 47/47 | 5.4 | 4.2 | 55.9% | 68.1% | 44.3% | 52.6% | 44.6% | 57.8% | 41.0% |
| 22 | 2014 | 44/46 | 3.2 | 8.2 | 53.9% | 70.1% | 49.0% | 53.4% | 44.4% | 60.3% | 43.8% | 2020 | 12/12 | 4.9 | 4.5 | 55.8% | 64.3% | 36.7% | 40.8% | 32.4% | 52.1% | 34.2% |
| 23 | 2015 | 36/47 | 3.1 | 10.5 | 60.2% | 68.8% | 54.7% | 56.5% | 54.2% | 63.0% | 41.9% | 2021 | 14/14 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 56.1% | 64.0% | 40.8% | 55.1% | 45.2% | 53.9% | 39.3% |
| 24 | 2016 | 32/37 | 2.0 | 6.9 | 56.7% | 62.8% | 45.8% | 51.5% | 46.0% | 55.4% | 42.1% | 2022 | 6/6 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 57.6% | 65.5% | 43.0% | 57.5% | 60.8% | 55.6% | 34.3% |
| 25 | 2017 | 27/28 | 2.9 | 6.5 | 56.0% | 64.5% | 47.9% | 50.1% | 45.3% | 57.4% | 42.1% | 2023 | 20/21 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 57.1% | 66.6% | 41.5% | 47.5% | 44.3% | 55.8% | 38.6% |
| 26 | 2018 | 43/45 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 59.2% | 67.0% | 49.8% | 51.2% | 49.9% | 60.1% | 44.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 25/28 | 2.7 | 6.0 | 55.8% | 62.6% | 46.0% | 48.7% | 52.2% | 55.2% | 44.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 19/19 | 2.7 | 6.7 | 56.5% | 64.6% | 47.6% | 49.2% | 45.0% | 57.4% | 41.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 34/41 | 3.5 | 6.8 | 54.2% | 67.0% | 48.5% | 46.3% | 49.1% | 58.5% | 44.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 30/30 | 2.4 | 7.3 | 54.3% | 66.8% | 44.8% | 45.9% | 48.2% | 56.7% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 35/35 | 3.0 | 6.3 | 56.0% | 67.8% | 45.8% | 56.8% | 46.0% | 58.2% | 45.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 8/8 | 3.8 | 7.0 | 54.0% | 68.3% | 42.3% | 64.2% | 47.5% | 56.5% | 37.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 366/400 | 2.9 | 7.1 | 56.2% | 66.5% | 47.7% | 51.6% | 47.6% | 58.2% | 43.2% | — | 129/130 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 56.5% | 66.8% | 42.9% | 52.1% | 43.2% | 56.5% | 39.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Camila Giorgi | Viktoria Hruncakova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1504 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2011 | 1486 | 95.9 | -1.46 | -1.61 | 0.519 | 37.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 | 2017 | 1536 | 111.1 | -0.54 | +0.80 | 0.874 | 47.4% | -32 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.14 |
| 20 | 2012 | 1524 | 109.2 | -0.06 | -0.52 | 0.966 | 49.3% | -40 | — | +152 | 37.5% | -0.78 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | +0.04 | 2018 | 1587 | 123.0 | +0.95 | -2.80 | 0.926 | 48.7% | -3 | -8 | +36 | 41.4% | -0.43 | 2–2 (50%) | 4–6 (40%) | 99.3 | -0.52 |
| 21 | 2013 | 1578 | 118.6 | -0.28 | -0.45 | 0.945 | 49.0% | -55 | -44 | +82 | 45.2% | -0.64 | 1–3 (25%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.6 | -0.04 | 2019 | 1660 | 127.6 | +0.84 | -1.27 | 0.972 | 49.1% | +8 | -2 | -91 | 48.6% | -0.27 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–7 (56%) | 104.3 | -0.40 |
| 22 | 2014 | 1710 | 139.3 | +3.53 | +0.42 | 1.105 | 51.9% | -5 | -132 | +5 | 57.3% | +0.60 | 9–11 (45%) | 9–9 (50%) | 101.9 | +0.57 | 2020 | 1570 | 104.3 | -3.58 | -4.07 | 0.713 | 43.1% | +34 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.93 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.77 |
| 23 | 2015 | 1728 | 132.8 | +4.03 | +0.45 | 1.135 | 52.6% | -8 | -203 | +75 | 51.9% | +0.18 | 10–8 (56%) | 6–5 (55%) | 99.6 | -0.69 | 2021 | 1574 | 112.2 | -1.68 | -2.26 | 0.852 | 47.0% | +38 | +2 | — | 41.9% | -0.90 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | +0.68 |
| 24 | 2016 | 1645 | 130.4 | -0.24 | -0.73 | 0.944 | 49.0% | +10 | -57 | +63 | 44.9% | -0.37 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 102.1 | -2.53 | 2022 | 1575 | 115.8 | -0.81 | -2.28 | 0.771 | 45.7% | +42 | — | — | 16.7% | -1.42 | — | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.18 |
| 25 | 2017 | 1760 | 124.4 | +1.05 | -0.11 | 0.987 | 50.1% | -52 | -146 | +35 | 49.3% | +0.18 | 10–3 (77%) | 5–7 (42%) | 106.2 | -1.25 | 2023 | 1617 | 115.3 | -0.93 | -2.80 | 0.874 | 47.1% | +1 | — | -22 | 41.9% | -0.86 | 3–2 (60%) | 4–2 (67%) | 103.5 | -0.51 |
| 26 | 2018 | 1866 | 142.2 | +3.05 | +1.65 | 1.117 | 52.4% | -27 | -140 | -22 | 61.6% | +0.82 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–1 (80%) | 104.5 | -0.86 | 2024 | 1542 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 1750 | 138.4 | -0.54 | +0.95 | 0.989 | 49.8% | +3 | — | — | 50.8% | +0.24 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–2 (67%) | 95.3 | -0.70 | 2025 | 1520 | 98.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 1737 | 130.8 | +0.83 | -1.43 | 0.968 | 49.3% | +18 | -34 | — | 53.2% | -0.11 | 6–5 (55%) | 6–0 (100%) | 104.5 | -0.95 | 2026 | 1520 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 1829 | 139.7 | +1.63 | +1.37 | 1.062 | 51.2% | -14 | -167 | +30 | 57.8% | +0.65 | 8–4 (67%) | 5–4 (56%) | 103.6 | -1.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 1770 | 135.5 | +0.11 | +1.41 | 1.004 | 50.0% | 0 | -96 | +100 | 52.1% | +0.13 | 4–9 (31%) | 3–5 (38%) | 93.9 | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 1791 | 142.9 | +1.46 | +1.59 | 1.078 | 51.6% | +17 | -99 | +67 | 59.7% | +0.61 | 3–5 (38%) | 6–4 (60%) | 99.9 | -1.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 1762 | 129.7 | +0.86 | -0.25 | 0.860 | 47.5% | +11 | — | — | 42.1% | -0.68 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | -1.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1900 | 141.2 | +1.54 | +0.55 | 1.033 | 50.7% | -8 | -112 | +54 | 52.9% | +0.22 | 66–68 (49%) | 56–41 (58%) | 104.4 | -2.43 | — | 1746 | 121.3 | -0.20 | -2.19 | 0.895 | 47.7% | +13 | -3 | -12 | 41.7% | -0.68 | 20–14 (59%) | 18–22 (45%) | 102.6 | -0.23 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | 1 | 7 | 8 | Aug 30, 2023 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 4 | 4 | 8 | Aug 15, 2021 | H2H |
| Alizé Cornet | 5 | 2 | 7 | May 30, 2023 | H2H |
| Sloane Stephens | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 25, 2023 | H2H |
| Andrea Petkovic | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 17, 2019 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jan 22, 2020 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jul 5, 2023 | H2H |
| Alison Van Uytvanck | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 10, 2020 | H2H |
| Xiyu Wang | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 22, 2023 | H2H |
| Veronika Kudermetova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 17, 2023 | H2H |