Camila Osorio
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Li | 2 | 4 | 6 | Aug 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Kamilla Rakhimova | 5 | 0 | 5 | Sep 10, 2025 | H2H |
| Ons Jabeur | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Anna Kalinskaya | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 30, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Camila Osorio holds a 1–0 lead over Shelby Rogers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Osorio leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Camila Osorio won the 2023 Eastbourne Open round of 32 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | 6-4 6-4 | Shelby Rogers | Match data | Jun 29, 2023* | R32 | Eastbourne Open | WTA 500 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | #59 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,826 | 104 | 96 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Shelby Rogers | #437 | #30 | 1,698 | 1,855 | 126 | 140 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Shelby Rogers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #151 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,718 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #59 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #630 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #47 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #149 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #341 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Shelby Rogers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2014 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2015 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2025 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2016 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2026 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2017 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 47 | 58 | 105 | 44.8% | 52 | 25 | 77 | 67.5% | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | — | 77 | 82 | 159 | 48.4% | 38 | 40 | 78 | 48.7% | 11 | 18 | 29 | 37.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 184/202 of Camila Osorio's and 252/266 of Shelby Rogers's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Shelby Rogers | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2018 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 60.0% | 61.9% | 32.1% | 58.3% | 28.6% | 50.0% | 36.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 7.0 | 57.8% | 62.9% | 46.8% | 57.1% | 41.6% | 56.3% | 47.6% | 2010 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 49.2% | 68.9% | 41.3% | 60.0% | 60.0% | 54.8% | 35.5% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 51.7% | 54.8% | 51.7% | 37.5% | 22.2% | 53.3% | 36.7% |
| 19 | 2021 | 29/30 | 1.4 | 5.3 | 63.1% | 61.1% | 38.4% | 51.1% | 49.0% | 52.7% | 48.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 30/31 | 1.2 | 4.1 | 68.6% | 59.0% | 40.9% | 50.2% | 44.0% | 53.3% | 44.7% | 2013 | 3/5 | 4.0 | 1.3 | 62.8% | 67.6% | 53.3% | 59.4% | 27.8% | 62.3% | 34.2% |
| 21 | 2023 | 32/32 | 0.7 | 5.3 | 64.2% | 60.6% | 42.3% | 50.7% | 40.1% | 53.9% | 44.9% | 2014 | 20/21 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 59.4% | 66.1% | 43.5% | 47.9% | 39.3% | 57.1% | 42.8% |
| 22 | 2024 | 32/35 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 64.8% | 58.9% | 40.8% | 49.3% | 52.1% | 52.4% | 45.4% | 2015 | 13/18 | 1.8 | 4.1 | 61.1% | 58.1% | 48.5% | 48.5% | 41.6% | 54.1% | 35.9% |
| 23 | 2025 | 26/38 | 1.8 | 6.1 | 62.6% | 61.7% | 40.2% | 54.1% | 46.6% | 53.8% | 44.7% | 2016 | 25/28 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 59.2% | 65.0% | 50.8% | 53.1% | 54.6% | 59.3% | 43.0% |
| 24 | 2026 | 31/32 | 1.5 | 5.7 | 63.7% | 62.3% | 44.9% | 50.3% | 52.9% | 55.7% | 45.9% | 2017 | 40/42 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 61.9% | 65.3% | 49.1% | 54.4% | 51.6% | 59.1% | 41.4% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 57.9% | 60.1% | 48.5% | 36.8% | 57.7% | 55.1% | 40.1% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12/12 | 4.9 | 3.4 | 58.6% | 62.2% | 47.5% | 50.8% | 52.1% | 56.2% | 43.6% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14/14 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 60.1% | 67.3% | 48.7% | 55.8% | 53.6% | 59.4% | 39.3% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 49/49 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 62.3% | 67.1% | 50.2% | 54.5% | 49.2% | 60.6% | 43.8% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 38/39 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 60.1% | 67.1% | 49.9% | 58.3% | 49.5% | 60.2% | 40.2% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 22/22 | 3.7 | 2.9 | 60.1% | 68.2% | 45.8% | 55.2% | 50.0% | 59.0% | 39.0% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12/12 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 58.0% | 64.8% | 47.7% | 51.0% | 41.6% | 57.3% | 40.4% |
| Career | — | 184/202 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 64.4% | 60.6% | 41.4% | 51.0% | 47.3% | 53.7% | 45.6% | — | 252/266 | 3.7 | 2.9 | 60.5% | 65.7% | 48.7% | 53.7% | 48.8% | 58.9% | 41.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Shelby Rogers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 2016 | 1483 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2017 | 1465 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 1454 | 96.2 | -0.76 | -2.99 | 0.738 | 43.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 1488 | 103.3 | +0.83 | +0.51 | 1.091 | 51.8% | — | +17 | — | 62.5% | +0.75 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | 2010 | 1494 | 105.0 | +0.17 | +0.58 | 0.785 | 45.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.10 |
| 18 | 2020 | 1483 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1479 | 95.8 | -4.03 | -4.58 | 0.787 | 43.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.08 |
| 19 | 2021 | 1699 | 120.1 | -2.66 | +3.25 | 1.014 | 50.4% | -108 | +13 | -63 | 52.3% | +0.08 | 7–0 (100%) | 3–4 (43%) | 107.0 | -0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 1689 | 126.5 | -2.72 | +0.83 | 0.957 | 48.9% | -8 | +34 | -184 | 48.3% | -0.35 | 3–3 (50%) | 9–7 (56%) | 104.1 | +0.85 | 2013 | 1478 | 105.2 | +0.56 | -2.93 | 0.907 | 49.1% | — | +62 | — | 50.0% | +0.17 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.53 |
| 21 | 2023 | 1731 | 132.4 | -1.96 | +1.86 | 0.974 | 49.5% | -54 | +87 | -241 | 52.9% | -0.04 | 6–2 (75%) | 6–3 (67%) | 106.3 | -2.02 | 2014 | 1631 | 132.2 | +1.08 | -0.03 | 0.997 | 49.8% | -30 | -7 | — | 53.2% | +0.15 | 4–1 (80%) | 4–3 (57%) | 105.7 | -0.57 |
| 22 | 2024 | 1757 | 132.8 | -3.36 | +0.94 | 0.954 | 49.1% | -66 | +105 | -187 | 53.8% | +0.01 | 5–9 (36%) | 9–4 (69%) | 100.9 | -0.70 | 2015 | 1528 | 107.8 | -2.17 | -3.76 | 0.783 | 44.7% | +11 | +55 | — | 28.2% | -1.67 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–3 (0%) | 92.8 | -0.14 |
| 23 | 2025 | 1719 | 136.8 | -2.42 | +1.16 | 0.969 | 49.3% | -24 | +106 | — | 51.7% | +0.08 | 9–5 (64%) | 2–5 (29%) | 101.1 | -0.23 | 2016 | 1585 | 127.2 | +2.25 | +0.12 | 1.057 | 51.1% | -39 | +110 | — | 49.3% | +0.09 | 5–8 (38%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.4 | +0.44 |
| 24 | 2026 | 1745 | 142.0 | -1.21 | +2.79 | 1.037 | 50.9% | +16 | +70 | — | 48.7% | +0.10 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–7 (30%) | 97.1 | -1.01 | 2017 | 1689 | 133.0 | +2.26 | -1.35 | 1.011 | 50.1% | -50 | +54 | -96 | 52.0% | +0.14 | 10–8 (56%) | 10–4 (71%) | 108.3 | -1.20 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1650 | 103.6 | -2.39 | -1.26 | 0.893 | 47.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.21 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1574 | 111.3 | -0.80 | -0.46 | 0.996 | 50.1% | — | +121 | +52 | 44.8% | -0.31 | 0–7 (0%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.20 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1680 | 132.2 | +1.94 | -0.55 | 0.967 | 49.3% | +16 | — | — | 51.5% | -0.12 | 4–1 (80%) | 3–2 (60%) | 106.2 | +0.47 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1805 | 147.1 | +3.43 | +1.34 | 1.111 | 52.0% | +24 | -149 | -144 | 57.1% | +0.48 | 6–10 (38%) | 8–6 (57%) | 96.6 | -0.42 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1804 | 144.1 | +2.94 | -1.21 | 1.009 | 50.3% | +44 | -170 | -145 | 52.2% | -0.08 | 6–10 (38%) | 7–2 (78%) | 99.2 | -1.95 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1773 | 137.9 | +1.67 | -1.25 | 0.951 | 49.1% | +77 | -140 | — | 42.6% | -0.41 | 5–7 (42%) | 0–6 (0%) | 92.1 | -1.29 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1676 | 122.2 | -0.04 | -0.79 | 0.948 | 48.6% | +36 | -21 | — | 32.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.39 |
| Career | — | 1826 | 136.1 | -2.32 | +1.76 | 0.984 | 49.7% | -34 | +69 | -164 | 51.3% | -0.01 | 37–27 (58%) | 32–31 (51%) | 106.7 | -1.82 | — | 1856 | 140.0 | +1.85 | -0.58 | 1.004 | 50.0% | +8 | -8 | -100 | 48.9% | -0.10 | 41–61 (40%) | 39–36 (52%) | 94.4 | -1.71 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Li | 2 | 4 | 6 | Aug 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Kamilla Rakhimova | 5 | 0 | 5 | Sep 10, 2025 | H2H |
| Ons Jabeur | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Anna Kalinskaya | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Rybakina | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 5, 2023 | H2H |
| Ashleigh Barty | 1 | 5 | 6 | Sep 4, 2021 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 8, 2024 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 25, 2022 | H2H |
| Veronika Kudermetova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 4, 2024 | H2H |