H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Chloe Paquet vs Cagla Buyukakcay
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Chloe Paquet vs Cagla Buyukakcay.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
TUR
Age 36
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloe Paquet | #297 | #96 | 746 | 1,634 | 18 | 49 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cagla Buyukakcay | #373 | #60 | 980 | 1,613 | 22 | 52 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chloe Paquet | Cagla Buyukakcay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #126 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #83 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #160 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #123 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |