H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Chloe Paquet vs Daria Saville H2H: 1-0
Chloe Paquet holds a 1–0 lead over Daria Saville in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chloe Paquet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chloe Paquet won the 2019 Strasbourg quarterfinal 6-3 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 32
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2019* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Chloe Paquet | 6-3 7-6(1) | Daria Saville | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloe Paquet | #297 | #96 | 746 | 1,634 | 18 | 49 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,836 | 156 | 153 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chloe Paquet | Daria Saville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #25 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #123 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |