H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Christina Mchale vs Renata Voracova H2H: 0-1
Renata Voracova holds a 1–0 lead over Christina Mchale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renata Voracova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Renata Voracova won the 2011 Memphis third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2020 | Hobart | WTA 250 | Q1 | Hard | Christina Mchale | 6-0 6-2 | Renata Voracova | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2011* | Memphis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Renata Voracova | 6-2 6-1 | Christina Mchale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Renata Voracova | #1,041 | #74 | 848 | 1,523 | 24 | 54 | 30.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christina Mchale | Renata Voracova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #128 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #81 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #184 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #212 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #844 | 1,396 | 0 | 0 |