H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:17 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Elise Mertens H2H: 5-0
Coco Gauff holds a 5–0 lead over Elise Mertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2026 Dubai fourth round 2-6 7-6(9) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5
–
0
5 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2026 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 2-6 7-6(9) 6-3 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2024* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 6-0 6-2 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2023* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 3-6 6-3 6-0 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| May 31, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Coco Gauff | 6-4 6-0 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2021* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Coco Gauff | 0-6 7-6(4) 7-5 | Elise Mertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Elise Mertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 |