H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Shelby Rogers H2H: 2-0
Coco Gauff holds a 2–0 lead over Shelby Rogers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2022 Doha second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2022* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 6-2 6-3 | Shelby Rogers | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2021* | Adelaide | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Coco Gauff | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Shelby Rogers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Shelby Rogers | #437 | #30 | 1,698 | 1,875 | 126 | 138 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Shelby Rogers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2014 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #72 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #630 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #47 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #149 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #341 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |