H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Coco Gauff vs Shelby Rogers H2H: 2-0

Coco Gauff holds a 2–0 lead over Shelby Rogers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2022 Qatar Open first round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Gauff
United States Age 22 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Shelby Rogers
United States Age 33 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Coco Gauff #23 6-2 6-3 Shelby Rogers #46 Match data Feb 22, 2022* R64 Qatar Open WTA 1000 Hard
Coco Gauff #52 2-6 6-4 6-4 Shelby Rogers #53 Match data Feb 26, 2021* QF Adelaide International WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Coco Gauff #4 #2 8,173 2,176 285 113 71.6% 2 4 1 1 4 12
Shelby Rogers #437 #30 1,698 1,855 126 140 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Gauff Shelby Rogers
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2019 11–5 68.8% #68 1,693 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 2020 10–8 55.6% #48 1,782 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 2021 35–16 68.6% #22 1,897 0 2 2010 0–1 0.0% #352 1,494 0 0
18 2022 38–22 63.3% #7 1,927 0 2 2011 0–1 0.0% #426 1,479 0 0
19 2023 51–16 76.1% #3 2,107 1 6 — — — — — — —
20 2024 54–17 76.1% #3 2,119 1 9 2013 2–3 40.0% #126 1,478 0 0
21 2025 43–16 72.9% #3 2,100 2 11 2014 12–9 57.1% #72 1,630 0 0
22 2026 43–13 76.8% #4 2,159 2 12 2015 4–14 22.2% #151 1,527 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2016 13–15 46.4% #59 1,585 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2017 23–19 54.8% #59 1,689 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2018 0–2 0.0% #630 1,650 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2019 3–9 25.0% #177 1,574 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2020 8–6 57.1% #60 1,679 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2021 28–21 57.1% #40 1,804 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2022 20–19 51.3% #47 1,804 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2023 9–13 40.9% #149 1,773 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2024 4–8 33.3% #341 1,675 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Coco Gauff Shelby Rogers
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2019 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2020 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2021 15 10 25 60.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2022 23 16 39 59.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2023 40 9 49 81.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2024 35 10 45 77.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2025 25 11 36 69.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
22 2026 28 7 35 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 2015 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 20 12 32 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 14 11 25 56.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 6 7 13 46.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
Career — 182 73 255 71.4% 77 26 103 74.8% 26 14 40 65.0% — 77 82 159 48.4% 38 40 78 48.7% 11 18 29 37.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 380/399 of Coco Gauff's and 252/266 of Shelby Rogers's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Coco Gauff Shelby Rogers
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2019 16/16 2.8 4.8 65.0% 63.7% 42.2% 52.0% 54.1% 56.1% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2020 18/18 3.1 8.3 61.0% 69.1% 42.3% 46.5% 55.8% 58.6% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2021 49/51 5.1 5.3 60.9% 69.1% 47.5% 55.5% 44.3% 60.6% 44.5% 2010 1/1 2.0 9.0 49.2% 68.9% 41.3% 60.0% 60.0% 54.8% 35.5%
18 2022 58/60 4.1 5.3 63.1% 67.1% 45.3% 57.8% 49.0% 59.2% 45.2% 2011 1/1 3.0 4.0 51.7% 54.8% 51.7% 37.5% 22.2% 53.3% 36.7%
19 2023 66/67 3.9 3.3 60.1% 68.8% 48.2% 56.6% 51.7% 60.7% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2024 68/71 3.6 6.1 58.4% 73.6% 45.5% 56.7% 52.8% 62.1% 49.7% 2013 3/5 4.0 1.3 62.8% 67.6% 53.3% 59.4% 27.8% 62.3% 34.2%
21 2025 54/60 2.7 6.9 62.4% 67.8% 45.3% 49.7% 57.7% 59.4% 49.6% 2014 20/21 3.3 3.5 59.4% 66.1% 43.5% 47.9% 39.3% 57.1% 42.8%
22 2026 51/56 3.1 4.9 63.3% 68.3% 44.1% 49.5% 48.2% 59.5% 48.1% 2015 13/18 1.8 4.1 61.1% 58.1% 48.5% 48.5% 41.6% 54.1% 35.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 25/28 3.5 3.0 59.2% 65.0% 50.8% 53.1% 54.6% 59.3% 43.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 40/42 3.4 2.5 61.9% 65.3% 49.1% 54.4% 51.6% 59.1% 41.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 2/2 5.0 5.0 57.9% 60.1% 48.5% 36.8% 57.7% 55.1% 40.1%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 12/12 4.9 3.4 58.6% 62.2% 47.5% 50.8% 52.1% 56.2% 43.6%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 14/14 4.2 2.6 60.1% 67.3% 48.7% 55.8% 53.6% 59.4% 39.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 49/49 4.0 2.4 62.3% 67.1% 50.2% 54.5% 49.2% 60.6% 43.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 38/39 4.3 3.0 60.1% 67.1% 49.9% 58.3% 49.5% 60.2% 40.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 22/22 3.7 2.9 60.1% 68.2% 45.8% 55.2% 50.0% 59.0% 39.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 12/12 2.2 2.3 58.0% 64.8% 47.7% 51.0% 41.6% 57.3% 40.4%
Career — 380/399 3.7 5.4 61.4% 69.0% 45.7% 54.1% 51.2% 60.1% 46.8% — 252/266 3.7 2.9 60.5% 65.7% 48.7% 53.7% 48.8% 58.9% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Coco Gauff Shelby Rogers
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2019 1694 127.4 -0.40 -1.45 0.957 49.2% -25 — +15 57.1% -0.11 5–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 110.5 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2020 1782 144.9 +0.78 +0.22 1.007 50.4% -13 -207 — 57.8% +0.27 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2021 1898 145.4 +3.52 +2.26 1.130 52.5% -104 +9 -86 60.2% +0.65 13–6 (68%) 10–7 (59%) 108.1 +0.08 2010 1494 105.0 +0.17 +0.58 0.785 45.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.10
18 2022 1927 158.3 +2.88 +2.90 1.106 52.0% -48 +73 -46 62.5% +0.84 6–4 (60%) 10–6 (63%) 103.4 -1.68 2011 1479 95.8 -4.03 -4.58 0.787 43.9% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.08
19 2023 2107 166.1 +4.50 +4.45 1.173 53.4% +40 -131 -245 70.9% +1.39 11–5 (69%) 8–1 (89%) 106.9 -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2024 2120 167.7 +4.83 +6.58 1.311 55.6% +53 -73 -151 70.9% +1.78 12–8 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 99.0 +0.77 2013 1478 105.2 +0.56 -2.93 0.907 49.1% — +62 — 50.0% +0.17 0–2 — — +0.53
21 2025 2101 167.3 +2.64 +6.44 1.221 54.4% +20 +119 — 66.9% +1.29 12–3 (80%) 10–6 (63%) 106.5 +0.39 2014 1631 132.2 +1.08 -0.03 0.997 49.8% -30 -7 — 53.2% +0.15 4–1 (80%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 -0.57
22 2026 2159 167.0 +3.18 +5.97 1.186 53.6% +51 +13 -195 68.6% +1.34 17–10 (63%) 8–4 (67%) 105.5 -0.08 2015 1528 107.8 -2.17 -3.76 0.783 44.7% +11 +55 — 28.2% -1.67 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.8 -0.14
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1585 127.2 +2.25 +0.12 1.057 51.1% -39 +110 — 49.3% +0.09 5–8 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 97.4 +0.44
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1689 133.0 +2.26 -1.35 1.011 50.1% -50 +54 -96 52.0% +0.14 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 108.3 -1.20
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1650 103.6 -2.39 -1.26 0.893 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–2 — +0.21
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1574 111.3 -0.80 -0.46 0.996 50.1% — +121 +52 44.8% -0.31 0–7 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.20
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1680 132.2 +1.94 -0.55 0.967 49.3% +16 — — 51.5% -0.12 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 106.2 +0.47
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1805 147.1 +3.43 +1.34 1.111 52.0% +24 -149 -144 57.1% +0.48 6–10 (38%) 8–6 (57%) 96.6 -0.42
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1804 144.1 +2.94 -1.21 1.009 50.3% +44 -170 -145 52.2% -0.08 6–10 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 99.2 -1.95
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1773 137.9 +1.67 -1.25 0.951 49.1% +77 -140 — 42.6% -0.41 5–7 (42%) 0–6 (0%) 92.1 -1.29
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1676 122.2 -0.04 -0.79 0.948 48.6% +36 -21 — 32.0% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.39
Career — 2176 166.5 +3.36 +4.35 1.171 53.3% +7 +2 -129 66.2% +1.15 79–42 (65%) 61–33 (65%) 113.8 -0.55 — 1856 140.0 +1.85 -0.58 1.004 50.0% +8 -8 -100 48.9% -0.10 41–61 (40%) 39–36 (52%) 94.4 -1.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.