H2H data updated: 2026-08-31 00:00 UTC

Danielle Collins vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 0-1

Su-Wei Hsieh holds a 1–0 lead over Danielle Collins in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Su-Wei Hsieh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Su-Wei Hsieh won the 2019 Sydney International first round 7-6(4) 6-3.

United States Age 32 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
Chinese Taipei Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Su-Wei Hsieh #28 7-6(4) 6-3 Danielle Collins #35 Match data Jan 9, 2019* R32 Sydney International Premier modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Danielle Collins #343 #7 3,702 2,073 174 118 59.6% 0 1 0 2 1 4
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,880 153 176 46.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Danielle Collins Su-Wei Hsieh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,548 0 0
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,540 0 0
19 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0
20 2014 0–1 0.0% #915 1,498 0 0 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0
21 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0
22 2016 0–1 0.0% #259 1,492 0 0 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0
23 2017 0–1 0.0% #177 1,484 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,473 0 0
24 2018 18–17 51.4% #36 1,659 0 0 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,454 0 0
25 2019 18–18 50.0% #29 1,717 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,458 0 0
26 2020 10–6 62.5% #45 1,812 0 0 2012 22–14 61.1% #25 1,672 0 2
27 2021 37–15 71.2% #29 1,891 0 2 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,554 0 2
28 2022 20–11 64.5% #14 1,898 0 2 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,542 0 2
29 2023 18–18 50.0% #52 1,854 0 2 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,581 0 2
30 2024 38–16 70.4% #11 1,950 0 4 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,586 0 2
31 2025 15–14 51.7% #64 1,859 0 4 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2
32 2018 32–17 65.3% #28 1,778 0 3
33 2019 31–24 56.4% #32 1,781 0 3
34 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,706 0 3
35 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3
37 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Danielle Collins Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 5 2 7 71.4%
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2005 0 3 3 0.0%
20 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2018 14 10 24 58.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2010 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2019 10 11 21 47.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2011 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2021 25 11 36 69.4% 11 3 14 78.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 10 18 28 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2022 17 6 23 73.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2023 17 15 32 53.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2024 16 10 26 61.5% 19 5 24 79.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 2025 6 8 14 42.9% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2017 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 2018 21 9 30 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5%
33 2019 23 16 39 59.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1%
34 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
35 2021 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
37 2023 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 111 79 190 58.4% 52 28 80 65.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 112 112 224 50.0% 21 37 58 36.2% 20 27 47 42.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 279/293 of Danielle Collins's and 285/321 of Su-Wei Hsieh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Danielle Collins Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 —/— 2005 1/3 0.0 1.0 68.9% 45.2% 28.6% 44.4% 0.0% 40.0% 31.9%
20 2014 1/1 2.0 0.0 59.0% 63.3% 52.9% 64.3% 20.0% 59.0% 32.3% 2006 2/4 0.0 1.5 70.8% 54.2% 53.1% 56.9% 10.7% 53.2% 36.5%
21 —/— 2007 3/8 0.3 3.0 58.2% 61.7% 45.8% 57.9% 26.5% 55.0% 34.9%
22 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.3% 26.9% 42.9% 30.0% 50.0% 34.0% 36.6% 2008 11/13 1.1 3.7 53.2% 62.4% 43.3% 51.4% 38.7% 53.6% 42.4%
23 2017 1/1 1.0 1.0 56.3% 37.0% 33.3% 25.0% 33.3% 35.4% 40.0% 2009 3/3 0.3 3.7 58.9% 51.8% 46.8% 29.4% 52.6% 49.8% 48.1%
24 2018 30/35 2.4 3.2 58.0% 60.3% 46.2% 47.0% 47.7% 54.1% 41.8% 2010 2/2 0.5 4.0 60.9% 63.3% 38.7% 52.2% 46.3% 53.7% 43.8%
25 2019 35/36 3.2 3.1 59.4% 62.0% 47.0% 51.0% 52.5% 56.2% 41.8% 2011 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.8% 59.0% 52.3% 72.4% 57.5% 56.4% 54.5%
26 2020 16/16 3.5 3.5 58.9% 71.1% 48.3% 61.6% 48.3% 61.3% 43.8% 2012 29/36 0.6 2.5 64.5% 63.4% 48.2% 50.2% 45.6% 58.1% 47.7%
27 2021 52/52 3.6 3.9 54.6% 70.3% 48.5% 54.9% 54.3% 60.2% 46.1% 2013 33/38 0.7 3.0 62.9% 54.8% 42.6% 45.6% 49.0% 50.2% 43.3%
28 2022 31/31 3.8 6.1 54.1% 69.6% 48.1% 57.9% 52.5% 59.6% 45.1% 2014 14/18 0.9 2.6 61.9% 54.6% 40.0% 41.3% 41.6% 49.3% 42.3%
29 2023 36/36 3.6 4.6 59.0% 67.2% 47.2% 55.1% 48.1% 58.8% 42.2% 2015 7/11 2.1 2.9 61.0% 61.1% 53.7% 55.2% 49.1% 58.2% 41.7%
30 2024 50/54 3.8 4.8 56.5% 71.1% 47.4% 58.9% 52.9% 60.8% 45.4% 2016 24/24 1.1 2.6 58.5% 61.5% 47.9% 48.7% 43.8% 55.8% 43.3%
31 2025 26/30 4.2 5.2 57.9% 66.1% 49.5% 55.1% 51.5% 58.8% 41.9% 2017 23/23 1.1 2.7 63.4% 56.9% 39.7% 45.0% 49.8% 50.5% 44.3%
32 —/— 2018 46/49 0.8 3.1 63.3% 60.9% 47.5% 57.5% 54.0% 56.0% 47.2%
33 —/— 2019 53/55 0.7 3.2 64.4% 61.9% 46.6% 51.7% 47.6% 56.5% 44.9%
34 —/— 2020 8/8 0.1 3.0 61.2% 53.2% 42.9% 42.4% 53.9% 48.9% 40.7%
35 —/— 2021 23/23 0.7 3.1 64.0% 55.2% 43.8% 49.8% 41.6% 51.7% 43.2%
37 —/— 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.9% 60.0% 44.4% 16.7% 45.5% 54.5% 45.5%
Career 279/293 3.5 4.3 57.0% 67.2% 47.7% 54.9% 51.3% 58.7% 43.7% 285/329 0.8 2.9 62.6% 59.3% 45.3% 50.0% 47.0% 54.1% 44.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Danielle Collins Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
15 2001 1548 108.6 +31 63.2% +1.00 3–2 (60%) 0–2 +1.12
16 2002 1541 99.3 0.0% -5.00 -0.23
19 2005 1506 99.1 -0.87 -2.03 0.532 35.9% +18 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 -0.18
20 2014 1498 107.7 +4.54 +2.42 0.787 44.9% 33.3% -2.67 0–1 1–0 -0.24 2006 1462 97.2 -0.43 -2.06 0.780 45.6% 11.1% -2.11 0–1 +0.03
21 2007 1419 94.3 -0.52 -2.42 0.776 45.0% +29 22.2% -2.00 0–2 0–1 -0.15
22 2016 1492 98.2 -2.62 -4.63 0.555 35.2% 0.0% -4.50 +0.13 2008 1483 115.6 -0.18 -0.54 0.915 47.9% +35 -31 40.0% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 1–1 -0.39
23 2017 1484 100.8 -2.66 +1.28 0.619 37.6% 0.0% -5.00 -0.14 2009 1473 99.4 -1.34 -1.35 0.959 48.9% +30 33.3% -0.83 +0.39
24 2018 1659 126.6 -1.48 -1.03 0.910 48.1% +14 -93 -38 46.8% -0.30 9–4 (69%) 2–2 (50%) +0.97 2010 1454 101.1 -0.49 +0.07 0.946 48.5% 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–2 -0.03
25 2019 1717 138.4 -0.18 -0.13 0.953 49.3% -18 -87 -80 51.3% -0.12 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) -1.21 2011 1459 105.4 -0.05 -0.94 1.250 55.5% 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 +0.27
26 2020 1813 147.3 +3.14 +1.35 1.131 52.7% -60 -109 60.0% +0.85 4–4 (50%) 0–1 -1.27 2012 1672 133.4 +1.38 +2.74 1.138 52.7% -4 -182 -35 58.2% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 5–5 (50%) +0.40
27 2021 1891 152.7 +3.13 +2.70 1.158 53.3% +4 -43 71.3% +1.40 9–5 (64%) 7–3 (70%) +0.72 2013 1554 116.0 -3.73 +0.15 0.871 46.8% +4 -81 +19 37.6% -1.02 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) -0.23
28 2022 1898 149.2 +2.47 +2.92 1.117 52.3% +79 -119 66.2% +0.81 3–5 (38%) 6–3 (67%) +0.10 2014 1542 107.7 -3.95 -1.33 0.834 45.9% +33 35.7% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) +0.26
29 2023 1855 153.7 +2.52 +1.03 1.025 50.4% +53 53.6% +0.20 5–9 (36%) 5–7 (42%) -2.00 2015 1582 111.2 -0.41 -0.09 0.996 50.3% +31 48.1% +0.04 4–1 (80%) 1–0 +0.05
30 2024 1951 160.8 +3.69 +3.10 1.157 53.2% -11 +71 -239 68.1% +1.30 9–7 (56%) 7–1 (88%) -1.22 2016 1586 119.0 -0.64 +0.61 0.979 49.4% -1 -70 -44 47.4% -0.11 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) -0.11
31 2025 1860 143.2 +1.81 -0.05 1.019 50.4% -7 +141 -159 50.7% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) -0.97 2017 1601 109.3 -4.05 +0.79 0.895 47.4% -15 -59 -29 37.0% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) +0.19
32 2018 1778 132.6 -0.63 +4.07 1.073 51.5% -22 -182 -83 58.2% +0.56 12–6 (67%) 5–4 (56%) -0.49
33 2019 1781 146.5 +0.12 +2.75 1.033 50.7% +29 -185 -15 52.6% +0.24 16–9 (64%) 10–8 (56%) -1.32
34 2020 1707 118.1 -2.64 +0.13 0.796 44.9% +27 -121 17.6% -2.35 0–1 1–0 -0.47
35 2021 1687 126.8 -2.62 -0.02 0.895 47.4% +64 -177 43.1% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) -1.53
37 2023 1658 96.7 -0.52 -0.38 1.002 49.4% 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 +0.20
38 2024 1628 102.2
Career 2074 154.6 +2.01 +1.46 1.057 51.3% +14 -3 -124 59.0% +0.55 49–46 (52%) 38–24 (61%) -1.76 1881 128.6 -1.28 +1.42 0.970 49.3% +14 -131 -34 46.0% -0.30 63–56 (53%) 39–44 (47%) -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.