H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daria Kasatkina vs Bianca Andreescu H2H: 0-3
Bianca Andreescu holds a 3–0 lead over Daria Kasatkina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bianca Andreescu leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bianca Andreescu won the 2022 Toronto second round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 26
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2022* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Bianca Andreescu | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Daria Kasatkina | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2022* | Bad Homburg | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Bianca Andreescu | 6-4 6-1 | Daria Kasatkina | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2019* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Bianca Andreescu | 5-7 6-2 7-5 | Daria Kasatkina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Kasatkina | #63 | #8 | 3,525 | 1,988 | 316 | 224 | 58.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Bianca Andreescu | #173 | #4 | 5,331 | 2,042 | 107 | 75 | 58.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daria Kasatkina | Bianca Andreescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #354 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #185 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #75 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 35–8 | 81.4% | #5 | 1,985 | 1 | 3 |
| 20 | 2017 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #46 | 1,855 | 1 | 3 |
| 22 | 2019 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #70 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #46 | 1,904 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #95 | 1,780 | 1 | 3 |
| 24 | 2021 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #26 | 1,842 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #132 | 1,776 | 1 | 3 |
| 25 | 2022 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2025 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #228 | 1,727 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2023 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #18 | 1,914 | 0 | 6 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,712 | 1 | 3 |
| 27 | 2024 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #9 | 1,929 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2025 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,781 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #63 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |