H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Daria Kasatkina vs Jil Teichmann H2H: 2-0
Daria Kasatkina holds a 2–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daria Kasatkina leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daria Kasatkina won the 2023 Abu Dhabi fourth round 1-6 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2023* | Abu Dhabi | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Daria Kasatkina | 1-6 6-0 6-2 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| May 14, 2022* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Daria Kasatkina | 6-4 3-2 (ret.) | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Kasatkina | #63 | #8 | 3,525 | 1,988 | 316 | 224 | 58.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daria Kasatkina | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #354 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #75 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2019 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #70 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2021 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #26 | 1,842 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2022 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2023 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #18 | 1,914 | 0 | 6 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2024 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #9 | 1,929 | 0 | 8 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,781 | 0 | 8 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2026 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #63 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |