H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Daria Kasatkina vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 2-0
Daria Kasatkina holds a 2–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daria Kasatkina leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daria Kasatkina won the 2017 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Daria Kasatkina | 6-2 6-4 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Apr 6, 2016* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Daria Kasatkina | 6-2 6-1 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Kasatkina | #63 | #8 | 3,525 | 1,988 | 316 | 224 | 58.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Daria Kasatkina | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #354 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #75 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #70 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #26 | 1,842 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #18 | 1,914 | 0 | 6 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #9 | 1,929 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,781 | 0 | 8 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #63 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |