H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 04:30 UTC
Daria Saville vs Garbiñe Muguruza H2H: 2-0
Daria Saville holds a 2–0 lead over Garbiñe Muguruza in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daria Saville leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daria Saville won the 2018 Rome third round 5-7 6-2 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 32
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2018* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Daria Saville | 5-7 6-2 7-6(6) | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2018* | Sydney | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Daria Saville | (w/o) | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,836 | 156 | 153 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daria Saville | Garbiñe Muguruza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #25 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 |
| 24 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 |
| 25 | 2019 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 |
| 27 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 |
| 28 | 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 |
| 30 | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |