H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Daria Saville vs Louisa Chirico H2H: 1-1
Daria Saville and Louisa Chirico are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Daria Saville won the 2017 Strasbourg third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 32
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 30
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2017* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Daria Saville | 6-2 6-3 | Louisa Chirico | Match data |
| May 6, 2016* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Louisa Chirico | 7-6(1) 6-2 | Daria Saville | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,836 | 156 | 153 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Louisa Chirico | #382 | #58 | 1,020 | 1,668 | 19 | 45 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daria Saville | Louisa Chirico | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #111 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #208 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #25 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |