H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Elena-Gabriela Ruse H2H: 0-3
Elena-Gabriela Ruse holds a 3–0 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elena-Gabriela Ruse leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena-Gabriela Ruse won the 2026 Linz fourth round 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 28
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2026 | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2026 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | 6-4 7-5 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
| Jul 11, 2021* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Elena-Gabriela Ruse | #72 | #51 | 1,127 | 1,880 | 61 | 82 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #251 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #87 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #121 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #88 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 |