Dayana Yastremska
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 7, 2024 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 21, 2025 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Katerina Siniakova H2H: 0-1
Katerina Siniakova holds a 1–0 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Katerina Siniakova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katerina Siniakova won the 2026 Adelaide International first round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Siniakova | 6-0 6-1 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data | Jan 13, 2026 | R32 | Adelaide International | WTA 500 | Hard |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #113 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Katerina Siniakova | #42 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,893 | 228 | 246 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Katerina Siniakova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #99 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #101 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2024 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,701 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #113 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #45 | 1,807 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,802 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,883 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #42 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Katerina Siniakova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2015 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2020 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 21 | 2021 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 22 | 2022 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2018 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 2023 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 10 | 18 | 28 | 35.7% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 24 | 2024 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2020 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2021 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 26 | 2026 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2022 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17 | 17 | 34 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Career | — | 84 | 99 | 183 | 45.9% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | — | 135 | 157 | 292 | 46.2% | 62 | 58 | 120 | 51.7% | 31 | 31 | 62 | 50.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 265/286 of Dayana Yastremska's and 446/476 of Katerina Siniakova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Katerina Siniakova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2016 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 56.2% | 65.3% | 38.9% | 52.3% | 24.3% | 53.0% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 4/4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 66.0% | 50.4% | 54.9% | 55.8% | 51.8% | 52.1% | 49.7% | 2013 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 11.0 | 61.3% | 56.1% | 38.9% | 50.0% | 71.4% | 49.5% | 44.6% |
| 18 | 2018 | 16/16 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 60.7% | 65.8% | 49.1% | 41.8% | 42.8% | 59.2% | 46.9% | 2014 | 10/10 | 1.7 | 4.4 | 61.7% | 63.9% | 42.1% | 54.2% | 38.1% | 55.3% | 45.6% |
| 19 | 2019 | 51/52 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 60.2% | 65.2% | 48.7% | 60.0% | 48.4% | 58.4% | 44.8% | 2015 | 26/33 | 1.7 | 5.5 | 66.1% | 62.0% | 50.4% | 53.7% | 47.1% | 58.1% | 41.4% |
| 20 | 2020 | 26/26 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 58.9% | 67.5% | 46.3% | 45.5% | 47.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% | 2016 | 34/37 | 2.7 | 4.0 | 58.7% | 63.5% | 43.7% | 51.7% | 50.0% | 55.3% | 43.5% |
| 21 | 2021 | 18/19 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 57.9% | 66.1% | 45.9% | 51.1% | 42.2% | 57.7% | 43.3% | 2017 | 45/46 | 2.2 | 3.8 | 62.4% | 61.8% | 42.4% | 54.6% | 49.1% | 54.7% | 43.6% |
| 22 | 2022 | 29/29 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 63.8% | 44.4% | 54.0% | 49.6% | 55.7% | 38.7% | 2018 | 48/48 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 59.3% | 64.0% | 45.4% | 48.7% | 46.8% | 56.4% | 43.2% |
| 23 | 2023 | 21/21 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 59.4% | 42.8% | 40.6% | 53.6% | 52.2% | 41.9% | 2019 | 47/48 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 60.4% | 62.6% | 46.1% | 50.1% | 46.4% | 56.0% | 45.3% |
| 24 | 2024 | 34/36 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 57.8% | 60.9% | 47.1% | 51.9% | 44.5% | 55.0% | 42.0% | 2020 | 19/19 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 65.8% | 55.8% | 42.7% | 50.3% | 46.1% | 51.4% | 40.6% |
| 25 | 2025 | 34/50 | 3.4 | 5.5 | 56.3% | 63.0% | 49.7% | 54.0% | 51.1% | 57.1% | 41.8% | 2021 | 39/39 | 1.7 | 5.9 | 61.3% | 64.5% | 45.4% | 54.1% | 55.5% | 57.2% | 46.6% |
| 26 | 2026 | 30/31 | 2.2 | 5.1 | 61.3% | 59.5% | 46.4% | 48.9% | 46.5% | 54.2% | 41.4% | 2022 | 32/36 | 1.5 | 4.9 | 64.5% | 58.7% | 41.3% | 52.7% | 50.7% | 52.6% | 42.8% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 38/39 | 2.3 | 5.1 | 62.6% | 62.5% | 44.4% | 45.2% | 43.9% | 55.8% | 45.8% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 50/52 | 1.8 | 5.3 | 61.6% | 63.1% | 44.7% | 45.5% | 51.0% | 56.0% | 45.9% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 28/38 | 1.8 | 5.6 | 61.3% | 63.9% | 41.8% | 51.3% | 47.9% | 55.4% | 44.6% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 29/30 | 1.8 | 4.7 | 61.5% | 64.3% | 45.2% | 58.2% | 44.6% | 56.9% | 44.0% |
| Career | — | 265/286 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 58.9% | 63.2% | 47.0% | 51.5% | 47.6% | 56.4% | 42.6% | — | 446/476 | 2.3 | 4.5 | 61.8% | 62.6% | 44.4% | 51.0% | 48.3% | 55.6% | 44.3% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Katerina Siniakova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2016 | 1464 | 101.4 | -1.01 | -2.08 | 0.858 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 1462 | 104.9 | -0.92 | +0.23 | 1.038 | 50.9% | — | +57 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | 2013 | 1489 | 101.5 | -2.26 | +1.26 | 0.882 | 47.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.01 |
| 18 | 2018 | 1731 | 136.1 | +1.60 | +2.48 | 1.148 | 52.9% | +20 | — | — | 60.5% | +1.03 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 94.2 | -0.03 | 2014 | 1521 | 119.3 | -0.71 | -0.45 | 1.019 | 50.3% | +20 | — | — | 43.5% | -0.22 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.8 | +0.46 |
| 19 | 2019 | 1822 | 150.9 | +1.72 | +2.31 | 1.077 | 51.7% | +13 | -207 | -152 | 60.2% | +0.63 | 5–9 (36%) | 6–5 (55%) | 95.7 | -1.96 | 2015 | 1523 | 112.2 | -0.42 | -0.27 | 0.987 | 49.9% | -25 | +16 | +104 | 41.3% | -0.43 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–6 (33%) | 96.6 | +0.31 |
| 20 | 2020 | 1792 | 146.0 | +1.19 | -0.19 | 1.016 | 50.4% | +18 | -118 | — | 52.5% | +0.16 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–5 (50%) | 100.7 | -1.02 | 2016 | 1765 | 130.6 | -0.14 | +0.26 | 0.975 | 49.6% | -53 | -89 | -86 | 49.4% | -0.07 | 7–6 (54%) | 3–2 (60%) | 103.3 | -2.24 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1693 | 125.3 | +1.13 | -0.92 | 1.021 | 50.3% | -17 | -2 | — | 47.7% | 0.00 | 1–7 (13%) | 4–4 (50%) | 91.7 | -0.11 | 2017 | 1695 | 133.7 | -0.94 | +0.48 | 0.963 | 49.3% | -23 | +84 | -66 | 50.0% | -0.08 | 11–9 (55%) | 4–2 (67%) | 103.3 | -1.76 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1614 | 122.9 | -0.45 | -2.85 | 0.874 | 47.6% | +13 | +47 | +10 | 43.1% | -0.63 | 5–6 (45%) | 7–4 (64%) | 100.8 | -0.44 | 2018 | 1780 | 137.2 | -0.09 | +0.44 | 0.989 | 49.7% | -11 | -32 | -109 | 53.0% | +0.04 | 13–10 (57%) | 10–8 (56%) | 102.2 | +0.17 |
| 23 | 2023 | 1669 | 127.5 | -3.00 | -0.65 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +26 | -37 | — | 31.3% | -1.19 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.8 | +0.36 | 2019 | 1675 | 133.8 | -0.06 | +1.86 | 1.029 | 50.5% | -18 | +94 | -38 | 42.3% | -0.28 | 8–11 (42%) | 5–5 (50%) | 96.9 | -0.30 |
| 24 | 2024 | 1649 | 136.0 | -0.99 | -0.74 | 0.933 | 48.8% | 0 | +39 | 0 | 45.1% | -0.28 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.5 | +1.15 | 2020 | 1701 | 130.6 | -3.03 | -0.58 | 0.836 | 46.1% | -49 | +82 | — | 33.3% | -1.10 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–0 | — | -1.42 |
| 25 | 2025 | 1816 | 146.4 | +0.46 | -0.46 | 0.975 | 49.9% | -83 | -9 | -41 | 56.5% | +0.37 | 8–9 (47%) | 11–3 (79%) | 106.2 | -1.02 | 2021 | 1802 | 144.9 | +1.25 | +3.21 | 1.089 | 51.8% | -109 | +51 | -13 | 54.7% | +0.44 | 9–8 (53%) | 8–3 (73%) | 107.7 | -2.85 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1706 | 127.7 | -2.66 | -1.59 | 0.905 | 48.1% | -45 | +111 | +58 | 41.3% | -0.73 | 4–9 (31%) | 7–4 (64%) | 97.2 | +0.44 | 2022 | 1763 | 133.3 | -2.97 | +0.63 | 0.904 | 47.8% | -22 | +55 | -76 | 46.2% | -0.36 | 8–6 (57%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.6 | -1.47 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1808 | 135.0 | -0.13 | +2.23 | 1.035 | 50.6% | -25 | — | -7 | 55.8% | +0.38 | 4–5 (44%) | 5–6 (45%) | 98.4 | -1.66 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1803 | 141.8 | -0.23 | +2.61 | 1.042 | 50.8% | -30 | -33 | +120 | 55.1% | +0.39 | 7–13 (35%) | 4–8 (33%) | 87.5 | -1.28 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1883 | 142.0 | -0.67 | +0.92 | 1.002 | 50.0% | +19 | -217 | +75 | 48.8% | -0.13 | 4–8 (33%) | 5–4 (56%) | 94.0 | -1.50 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1821 | 142.6 | +0.08 | +1.58 | 1.022 | 50.5% | +25 | -134 | +86 | 50.0% | -0.07 | 4–7 (36%) | 4–4 (50%) | 95.9 | -0.57 |
| Career | — | 1884 | 142.7 | -0.06 | -0.20 | 0.977 | 49.7% | -8 | -22 | -27 | 49.8% | -0.02 | 40–61 (40%) | 51–39 (57%) | 97.0 | -0.88 | — | 1894 | 141.3 | -0.47 | +1.23 | 0.997 | 49.9% | -24 | +8 | +14 | 49.1% | -0.05 | 82–93 (47%) | 58–53 (52%) | 97.7 | -2.99 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Katerina Siniakova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 3 | 5 | 8 | Sep 20, 2025 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 2 | 6 | 8 | Sep 18, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 3 | 5 | 8 | Jun 19, 2025 | H2H |
| Kristina Mladenovic | 4 | 4 | 8 | Apr 23, 2021 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jun 17, 2026 | H2H |