H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 1-1
Dayana Yastremska and Saisai Zheng are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Dayana Yastremska won the 2018 Hong Kong fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2018* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Dayana Yastremska | 6-3 6-3 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2018 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 6-4 6-3 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Dayana Yastremska | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |