H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Donna Vekic vs Garbiñe Muguruza H2H: 1-2
Garbiñe Muguruza holds a 2–1 lead over Donna Vekic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Garbiñe Muguruza leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2021 US Open first round 7-6(4) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 7-6(4) 7-6(5) | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| May 8, 2018* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Garbiñe Muguruza | 2-6 6-4 6-1 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Apr 3, 2014* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Donna Vekic | 7-6(5) 7-6(2) | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Vekic | Garbiñe Muguruza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 |
| 24 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 |
| 25 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 |
| 30 | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |