H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Donna Vekic vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 1-0
Donna Vekic holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Donna Vekic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2021 Courmayeur fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2021* | Courmayeur | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Donna Vekic | 6-3 6-4 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Donna Vekic | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |