H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Ekaterina Alexandrova vs Jil Teichmann H2H: 1-1
Ekaterina Alexandrova and Jil Teichmann are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jil Teichmann leads 1–0 on clay, while Ekaterina Alexandrova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Alexandrova won the 2020 Australian Open first round 6-4 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2020* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ekaterina Alexandrova | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| May 1, 2019* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jil Teichmann | 6-3 6-4 | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | #19 | #10 | 3,375 | 1,985 | 248 | 189 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2017 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #73 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2019 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #35 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2021 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #34 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,905 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 5 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #28 | 1,780 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #10 | 1,949 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #19 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |